2020
DOI: 10.1177/0033688220943431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonetic Symbols in Contemporary Pronunciation Instruction

Abstract: This article explores the potential of phonetic symbols in pronunciation teaching/learning, with a focus on English language teaching (ELT). After a brief contextualisation of current views of pronunciation instruction in the second-language (L2) teaching literature, the paper reviews some of the potential advantages of, conditions for, and alternatives to their use together with research-based evidence. The exploration then focuses on the use of phonetic symbols for pronunciation instruction in contemporary l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the prior literature (Atkielski 2005;Lintunen 2005;Marshall 2020;Mompean 2005;Sordelli et al 2022;Trinh et al 2022), phonemic transcription in the IPA was regarded as a diagnostic means of error identification as far as the participants' /z/-related mistakes were concerned. In light of the methodological approach adopted by Lintunen (2005), Mompean (2017), and Mompean and Fouz-González (2021), /z/-related mistakes made by the participants in the phonemic transcriptions were assumed to be indicative of the lack of awareness of /z/ and, consequently, its correct use in their speech production in English.…”
Section: Methodology and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the prior literature (Atkielski 2005;Lintunen 2005;Marshall 2020;Mompean 2005;Sordelli et al 2022;Trinh et al 2022), phonemic transcription in the IPA was regarded as a diagnostic means of error identification as far as the participants' /z/-related mistakes were concerned. In light of the methodological approach adopted by Lintunen (2005), Mompean (2017), and Mompean and Fouz-González (2021), /z/-related mistakes made by the participants in the phonemic transcriptions were assumed to be indicative of the lack of awareness of /z/ and, consequently, its correct use in their speech production in English.…”
Section: Methodology and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the benefit of using social media in an educational setting is the possibility of enabling learners to “exchang[e] their language skills and shar[e] their language knowledge by participating in such authentic learning platforms” (Nikbakht & Boshrabadi, 2015, p. 1636). Many L2 studies have integrated social media into their instruction by observing the beneficial potential of social media for language learning (Dizon, 2016; Jin, 2015; Mompean & Fouz‐González, 2016; Nikbakht & Boshrabadi, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L2 researchers have documented the effects of social media on learners' vocabulary learning (Nikbakht & Boshrabadi, 2015), intercultural learning (Jin, 2015), speaking skills (Sun et al, 2017; Sun & Yang, 2015), pronunciation (Mompean & Fouz‐González, 2016) and writing skills (Dizon, 2016). In particular, social media‐integrated language learning holds considerable promise for the oral proficiency of EFL learners who experience speaking anxiety.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have looked into the potential of technology in language learning in the context of Indonesia. Those studies looked at various aspects of language learning, such as teaching writing skills via Edmodo (Purnawarman et al, 2016), Facebook (Rodliyah, 2016), Twitter for EFL Pronunciation (Mompean, 2016), andBlog (Sari, 2014), teaching grammar via Facebook (Sumakul, 2014), and Teaching English Using Telegram Application (Putra, 2021). In addition, some other studies discussed the possibility of using technology to teach content courses (Lie, 2013), as an alternative in language teaching (Mali, 2016), and Teachers' Consideration in Technology-Integrated Lesson Design (Dewi, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%