1990
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(90)90023-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological process decline from 2 to 8 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…While normative data on single word production for children of this age are available (Chirlian & Sharpley, 1982;Craig, Thompson, Washington & Potter, 2003;Haynes & Moran, 1989;Kilminster & Laird, 1978;McLeod & Arciuli, 2009;Roberts, Burchinal & Footo, 1990;Smit, Hand, Freilinger, Bernthal & Bird, 1990), to date there have been no studies which have provided population data for older children across different sample types. Moreover, studies of PSD have typically used small clinical samples rather than reference to a normative dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While normative data on single word production for children of this age are available (Chirlian & Sharpley, 1982;Craig, Thompson, Washington & Potter, 2003;Haynes & Moran, 1989;Kilminster & Laird, 1978;McLeod & Arciuli, 2009;Roberts, Burchinal & Footo, 1990;Smit, Hand, Freilinger, Bernthal & Bird, 1990), to date there have been no studies which have provided population data for older children across different sample types. Moreover, studies of PSD have typically used small clinical samples rather than reference to a normative dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phonological processes are mostly typical in a child's speech, remediating spontaneously at different ages depending on the type of process. Some phonological processes do not occur frequently in typically developing speech and their frequent occurrence may indicate disordered speech development [66]. S1's use of phonological processes did not reach clinical relevance throughout her participation.…”
Section: Speech Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no agreed upon criterion for determining what is and is not a problem when reporting the frequency of occurrence of an error for preschool children with SSD (Kirk & Vigeland, 2015). For instance, in studies which report the presence of phonological processes in children with typically developing speech and language, speech errors have been considered "present" based on: one instance of the use of a phonological process (Hodson & Paden, 1981), at least five instances of a process (Dodd et al, 2003), or on 20% of opportunities to use the process (Haelsig & Madison, 1986;Roberts, Burchinal & Footo, 1990). In a recent study by James, Ferguson and Butcher (2016) with typically developing children aged 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-and 7-years, a phonological process was considered to be in use at each year age if: (1) 20% of the children produced the process and (2) the median percent process occurrence was greater than 5%.…”
Section: Frequency Of Errors On Polysyllabic Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%