2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4976563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonon interference in crystalline and amorphous confined nanoscopic films

Abstract: Using molecular dynamics phonon wave packet simulations, we study phonon transmission across hexagonal (h)-BN and amorphous silica (a-SiO 2 ) nanoscopic thin films sandwiched by two crystalline leads. Due to the phonon interference effect, the frequency-dependent phonon transmission coefficient in the case of the crystalline film (Sijh-BNjAl heterostructure) exhibits a strongly oscillatory behavior. In the case of the amorphous film (Sija-SiO 2 jAl and Sija-SiO 2 jSi heterostructures), in spite of structural d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to the Si/a-SiO 2 interfaces, wave packet simulations have shown that for phonons of lower than 1 THz frequencies, their transmission coefficients at the interface are 0.98 and 0.95 for longitudinal and transverse phonon branches, respectively. , These results are comparable with the prediction from the acoustic mismatch model (AMM), which yields transmission coefficients for longitudinal and transverse phonons as 0.98 and 0.94, respectively . As such, in our model, we approximate the phonon transmission coefficient at the Si/a-SiO 2 interface as unity and combine its effects into the transmission through the vdW interface by adjusting the fitting parameter, K A in eq .…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to the Si/a-SiO 2 interfaces, wave packet simulations have shown that for phonons of lower than 1 THz frequencies, their transmission coefficients at the interface are 0.98 and 0.95 for longitudinal and transverse phonon branches, respectively. , These results are comparable with the prediction from the acoustic mismatch model (AMM), which yields transmission coefficients for longitudinal and transverse phonons as 0.98 and 0.94, respectively . As such, in our model, we approximate the phonon transmission coefficient at the Si/a-SiO 2 interface as unity and combine its effects into the transmission through the vdW interface by adjusting the fitting parameter, K A in eq .…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…This difference, however, is not important if the penetration depth of thermal phonons in a-SiO 2 is approximately the same as the interatomic distance. We note that phonon transmission through Si/a-SiO 2 /Si sandwiched structures has been studied using wave packet simulations; 8,22 the results suggested that a large portion of phonons with frequencies up to 1.4 THz, which contribute more than 20% to the thermal conductivity of silicon, 23 could still ballistically penetrate through a 10 nm a-SiO 2 layer. However, no convincing experimental demonstration of this prediction has been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Yet, what is interesting to notice is that propagons can ballistically go through thin amorphous layers. This was recently demonstrated by Liang et al [48] for a-SiO 2 thin layers (4.6-9.2 nm) sandwiched between Si leads. In this work the governing criterion to check the propagative behavior of carriers is the Ioffe-Regel (IR) frequency that discriminates between propagons and diffusons.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In Ref. [48] the IR frequency of a-SiO 2 is about 1.4 THz, while for a-Si it is about 2 THz [49]. Thus, there are propagative modes on a more extended frequency range in amorphous silicon as compared to silicon dioxide.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Liang et al that in the crystalline and amorphous sandwiched structures, phonon interference effect would exist if the thickness of the central amorphous silicon film were less than 5 nm 28 . A similar scale of phonon penetration depth was also observed in amorphous silicon dioxide 29 .…”
Section: (I)-(iv) It Was Reported Bymentioning
confidence: 99%