2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphate-limited growth and uptake kinetics of the marine prasinophyte Tetraselmis suecica (Kylin) Butcher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ammonium concentrations were consistently above concentrations that would be expected to limit phytoplankton growth [30], and silicate concentrations were consistently above concentrations that would be expected to limit diatom growth [24,31]. Phosphate concentrations that are limiting to phytoplankton growth are on the order of 10 nM [32,33], but the standard assay for molybdate-reactive phosphorus [34] gives a positive response for a large number of dissolved organo-phosphorus compounds [35], and it is therefore likely that the average molybdate-reactive phosphorus concentration of 0.5 µM is an overestimation of the inorganic phosphate concentration in University Lake. To the extent that phytoplankton biomass in the lake is limited by the concentration of a macronutrient, phosphate appears to be the most likely candidate, as is the case in many freshwater systems [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ammonium concentrations were consistently above concentrations that would be expected to limit phytoplankton growth [30], and silicate concentrations were consistently above concentrations that would be expected to limit diatom growth [24,31]. Phosphate concentrations that are limiting to phytoplankton growth are on the order of 10 nM [32,33], but the standard assay for molybdate-reactive phosphorus [34] gives a positive response for a large number of dissolved organo-phosphorus compounds [35], and it is therefore likely that the average molybdate-reactive phosphorus concentration of 0.5 µM is an overestimation of the inorganic phosphate concentration in University Lake. To the extent that phytoplankton biomass in the lake is limited by the concentration of a macronutrient, phosphate appears to be the most likely candidate, as is the case in many freshwater systems [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…μ max is often unobtainable, and in reality is only a fitting parameter for the equation (Droop , Laws et al. ,b, ). Also Q should be the average daily cell quota since quotas for P and other nutrients (e.g., N and Fe) typically vary with time of day due to diel variations in rates of nutrient uptake, cell growth and cell division (Ahn et al.…”
Section: Growth Limitation and Cellular Responses To Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods, however, also typically measure some reactive DOP compounds, and may overestimate the true dissolved Pi concentration (Thomson‐Bulldis and Karl , Laws et al. ). Because of this, the Pi measured by these methods is often referred to as soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) with the knowledge that it likely includes some DOP and other reactive P compounds, especially in low‐Pi oceanic surface waters with high DOP:Pi ratios (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular methods of measuring the activity of assimilatory enzymes can provide important information about N utilization (Fan et al, 2003;Lomas, 2004), but quantifying N uptake and its conversion into producer biomass still requires monitoring total phytoplankton assimilation (either directly with isotope techniques, or indirectly from ambient N depletion) and producer population densities (Bronk et al, 2007). Typically, species-specific kinetic estimates for per-cell N uptake are calculated by dividing N consumed by cell density at successive points in time, and then fitting a saturating Michaelis-Menten functional response (Laws et al, 2011;Maguer et al, 2007;Tantanasarit et al, 2013). While convenient when analyzing rates of N utilization under constant nutrient regimes, this technique cannot tractably capture the functional relationships that govern important processes, such as interactions between nitrate and ammonium uptake and acclimatization following extended starvation periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%