2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phospho-histone-H3 immunostaining for pulmonary carcinoids: impact on clinical appraisal, interobserver correlation, and diagnostic processing efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further distinguish the impact of PPP1R14B on G 2 or M phase of the cell cycle, flow cytometry analysis was performed using the p-H3 S10 antibody to detect mitotic cells. It has been well documented that p-H3 S10 is a specific marker in mitosis and exists only during the late G 2 phase and mitosis ( 31 ). Results showed that the percentage of p-H3 S10-positive cells was obviously increased after PPP1R14B knockdown (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further distinguish the impact of PPP1R14B on G 2 or M phase of the cell cycle, flow cytometry analysis was performed using the p-H3 S10 antibody to detect mitotic cells. It has been well documented that p-H3 S10 is a specific marker in mitosis and exists only during the late G 2 phase and mitosis ( 31 ). Results showed that the percentage of p-H3 S10-positive cells was obviously increased after PPP1R14B knockdown (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothetical classification systems were created by replacing the mitotic count criteria with the measured expression of Ki-67 and PHH3, with nine threshold values chosen for each marker to explore the effect of thresholds, which is often debated. 8 , 14 The classification’s relevance was assessed based on the reproducibility of the diagnoses and the prognostic value of the two groups obtained, by majority voting, according to recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery, which considers patients who have relapsed or died of the disease or from an unreported cause. To assess whether the new classification systems defining ‘new groups’ had similar or different prognostic values to the official classification, we measured the differences in prognosis between the new groups (Cox model 1); we also compared prognosis between the new ACs and consensus ACs (Cox model 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Indeed, mitotic figures are unevenly distributed across the tumour tissue, with large random effects, and unfortunately the current guidelines do not suggest any preferential method for mitotic counting. A possible solution for precise mitotic counting is IHC for phosphohistone H3 (PHH3), a marker of mitotic figures, which has been suggested to reduce interobserver variability in many tumour entities, including lung carcinoids, [58][59][60][61][62] but its use in routine grading requires validation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%