Myriad extracellular and intracellular signals constantly poke or prod cells in order to influence the vast number of functions required of cells to maintain homeostasis. Selective reception of these signals and of their subsequent translation and transduction are tasks coordinated by cellular signaltransduction systems. Two of these systems, the Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated ERKkinase)/ERK cascade and the cAMP/PKA signaling system, each regulate numerous cellular functions and their influences on these continue to be the subject of intense study (1). Interestingly, research confirms that rather than functioning in mutually independent "tracks," the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade and the cAMP/PKA system often interact and numerous reports document where activation of cAMP/PKA signaling either amplified or antagonized Ras/Raf/ MEK/ERK-mediated events, both in physiological settings as well as in pathologies, including cancers (1, 2). Although numerous points of intersection between these systems have been described (1, 2), one critical point of interplay involves an inhibitory PKAmediated phosphorylation of Raf-1 (V-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1, also known as C-Raf) at S259. Raf-1 is one of the three known MEK kinases, along with A-Raf and B-Raf, which can stimulate MEK-catalyzed ERK phosphorylation in this cascade. In PNAS, Brown et al., (3) provide mechanistic insights into the manner by which PKA-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of Raf-1 is regulated in cells, and they highlight a role for localized hydrolysis of cAMP in this important process.The unique mechanism elaborated in Brown et al., (3) fits perfectly in an emerging paradigm in which the selectivity of intracellular cAMP-signaling is achieved through the creation of several distinct nonoverlapping intracellular cAMP-signaling compartments, and the ability of cells to differentially task these compartments with the control of distinct cAMP-regulated cellular functions. Although early researchers who proposed the existence of cellular signaling compartments were largely ignored, currently this concept is rapidly gaining broad acceptance. In a cellular context, these compartments are defined by the unique integration of several proteins, including-but not limited to-scaffolding proteins (such as A-kinase anchoring proteins), cAMP effectors (PKA, exchange proteins activated by cAMP, or cyclic nucleotide-regulated ion channels), and cAMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases (PDEs) into signaling complexes, and the subsequent subcellular tethering of these complexes (termed "signalosomes") into defined subcellular domains. Localized cAMP-signaling is thus largely achieved through activation of individual cAMPeffectors in selected compartments, a process dynamically regulated, and often limited, through the local hydrolysis of cAMP by the cAMP-PDEs located in said compartment. Although there are relatively few distinct cAMP effectors, given the large number of scaffolding proteins [15 AKAP families (4, 5)] and PDEs [11 gene families (PDE1-PDE11)...