1981
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/32.2.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase from the Crassulacean PlantBryophyllum fedtschenkoiHametet Perrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under saturating conditions at pH 8, the activity of PEP carboxylase from K. daigremontiana increases by a factor of 2.3 in this temperature interval (2,19). For the enzyme from Bryophyllumfedtschenkoi the factor is 2.8 (12). Even if in vivo conditions are less than totally saturating with regard to both substrates, this temperature factor should be approximately correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Under saturating conditions at pH 8, the activity of PEP carboxylase from K. daigremontiana increases by a factor of 2.3 in this temperature interval (2,19). For the enzyme from Bryophyllumfedtschenkoi the factor is 2.8 (12). Even if in vivo conditions are less than totally saturating with regard to both substrates, this temperature factor should be approximately correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Malate has long been postulated as a means of regulating the activity PEPc (10), and studies with crude extracts of CAM plant leaves have shown (11,19,22) that during the day the enzyme is strongly inhibited by malate, while after short periods of darkness it is relatively insensitive to inhibition by malate. When PEPc is purified, the sensitivity to malate is rapidly lost (22), although Jones et al (6) found that PEG and desalting ofextracts protected the enzyme from loss of malate sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of interactions of malate with G-6-P are manifold (2,4,5,9,11,12), although they include few examples of studies with even partially purified enzymes. Indeed, a major problem in understanding PEPC regulation has been the transient nature of the characteristics attributable to PEPC and the differing characteristics reported for the enzyme from different species (2,6,7,12). The trend with the CAM enzyme appears to be loss during purification or storage ofthe sensitivity to malate associated with the day enzyme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%