“…This is because differences in other abiotic and/or biotic factors along the chronosequence not considered in our study might also influence PSF. However, this chronosequence and its soils have been extensively studied (e.g., Abrahão, Ryan, Laliberté, Oliveira, & Lambers, ; Albornoz et al, ; Hayes et al, ; Laliberté et al, , ; Teste, Veneklaas, Dixon, & Lambers, ; Turner & Laliberté, ; Zemunik et al, , ), enabling us to adopt a sampling design that maximises variation in soil age (i.e., soil chemistry; in particular, soil fertility, N and P availability) while minimising variation in other factors (e.g., climate, topography). Therefore, to further advance our understanding of PSF during long‐term ecosystem development, future studies should focus on PSF experiments involving soil nutrient manipulation, or test PSF responses along other long‐term soil chronosequences.…”