2019
DOI: 10.1590/2318-0331.241920170137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus and thermotolerant coliforms’ loads in Brazilian watersheds with limited data: considerations on the integrated analysis of water quality and quantity

Abstract: Integrated analyses of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of aquatic ecosystems play an important role in decision making, which is linked to water resources management and promotion of ecosystem services. However, the possible advantages of such integration are still hampered by basic aspects, such as high uncertainties due to the partial and non-synchronized monitoring of discharges and observed concentrations of water quality variables. The lack of data has been limiting the adequate representation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The TP load presents some well-known characteristics and strong correlations with parameters related to the catchment or the reservoir. Firstly, larger catchments have the potential to produce more TP load (Marques et al 2019). Additionally, there is a relation between phosphorus pollution from nonpoint sources with flow conditions, as runoff events widely contribute on P load to rivers (Greene et al 2011).…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TP load presents some well-known characteristics and strong correlations with parameters related to the catchment or the reservoir. Firstly, larger catchments have the potential to produce more TP load (Marques et al 2019). Additionally, there is a relation between phosphorus pollution from nonpoint sources with flow conditions, as runoff events widely contribute on P load to rivers (Greene et al 2011).…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the CR is composed of unique values for concentrations and reference discharges, a situation that confers challenges in relation to ecological flows proposition in a determined hydrographic basin. 8 The first element that deserves attention is the fact that CR does not consider the different ecoregions in the country as well as the information related to biotic communities, 6,9 and intrinsic characteristics, such as the high concentrations of Fe and Mg in water bodies inserted in Brazilian savannas areas.…”
Section: Aspects That Should Be Considered During the Cr Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the LDCs can easily portray the streamflow classes in disagreement with the regulations, and therefore, shed light on best management practices to improve water quality [14,15]. In that context, pollution events related to shorter permanence (i.e., high flows) are usually associated with diffuse pollution sources, whereas events related to higher permanence (i.e., low flows) are commonly linked to point source pollution [11,13,16].In Brazil, there have been some attempts to use LDCs, but the frequent non-synchronous streamflow and water quality sampling represented a limitation [17][18][19][20]. For instance, FDCs were developed for rivers in the state of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Paraná (SP) but considered the monthly average of streamflow in the estimation of the load [18,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, pollution events related to shorter permanence (i.e., high flows) are usually associated with diffuse pollution sources, whereas events related to higher permanence (i.e., low flows) are commonly linked to point source pollution [11,13,16].In Brazil, there have been some attempts to use LDCs, but the frequent non-synchronous streamflow and water quality sampling represented a limitation [17][18][19][20]. For instance, FDCs were developed for rivers in the state of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Paraná (SP) but considered the monthly average of streamflow in the estimation of the load [18,20]. The monthly average makes the day-to-day flow variation smoother, thereby, hampering the comparison between the loading capacity and the observed pollutant load into the river.A relevant application of LDCs refers to the quantification of a potential load reduction per hydrological regime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation