1970
DOI: 10.1039/j19700001049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus–fluorine chemistry. Part XXII. Alkylthio- and arylthio-substituted fluorophosphoranes

Abstract: Alkylthio-and arylthio-fluorophosphoranes of the types RISPFp, R1S(R2)PF3, and R1S(R2)2PF2, (R1 = Me, Et, or Ph; R2 = Me or Ph) are prepared in good yields by the cleavage of sulphur-silicon bonds in trimethylsilylsulphides by fluorophosphoranes. The structures of the new compounds are deduced from l 9 F and 31P n.m.r. data.THE structures of fluorophosphoranes which contain hetero-atoms are of considerable interest,2 and since few compounds in this class were known, apart from those containing nitrogen as a he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As 7, is thought to be known to better than 10 K in each case, it would appear that the barriers to rotation are indeed higher in compounds (3) and (4) than in compounds ( 5) and ( 6), and, since the two pairs of compounds differ only in that the latter are substituted at the 3-position on the piperidyl ring while the former are substituted at the 2-position, this seems to substantiate the importance of some form of steric interaction, either attractive in the form of an interaction between H and F in the ground state, or repulsive through steric crowding in the equatorial plane in the excited state. The difference in AG,Z between compounds (3) and (4) themselves would appear to favour the latter of these suggestions, since in (3) the bulky phenyl group in the equatorial plane would probably cause a greater degree of steric hindrance to rotation than would be expected from the methyl substituent in (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As 7, is thought to be known to better than 10 K in each case, it would appear that the barriers to rotation are indeed higher in compounds (3) and (4) than in compounds ( 5) and ( 6), and, since the two pairs of compounds differ only in that the latter are substituted at the 3-position on the piperidyl ring while the former are substituted at the 2-position, this seems to substantiate the importance of some form of steric interaction, either attractive in the form of an interaction between H and F in the ground state, or repulsive through steric crowding in the equatorial plane in the excited state. The difference in AG,Z between compounds (3) and (4) themselves would appear to favour the latter of these suggestions, since in (3) the bulky phenyl group in the equatorial plane would probably cause a greater degree of steric hindrance to rotation than would be expected from the methyl substituent in (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15-20 K, whereas the opposite assignment (for, e.g., the a isomer) gives values for AG,* differing by up to ca. 4.2 kJ mol-' (ca. 1 kcal mol-l) using similar AT, values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture was stirred for 2 h (monitored by 31 P NMR) then evaporated to dryness. The resulting phosphorus species Ph 2 PÀCCÀPPh 2, [19] Ph 2 PÀNHPh, [20] Ph 2 POMe [21] or Ph 2 PSH [22] were extracted with pentane and characterized by comparison of their NMR data with that reported in the literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. E. Job et al proposed the treatment of sodium thiophenolate with a solution of diphenylchlorophosphine in diethyl ether under dry nitrogen in order to prepare the PPh 2 (SPh) ligand [46]. During the last 40 years, different synthetic routes of phenylthio(diphenyl)phosphine were the topic of further numerous articles [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Preparation Of Eph 2 (Sph)mentioning
confidence: 99%