2018
DOI: 10.2175/106143017x15131012188006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus Recovery by Methods Beyond Struvite Precipitation

Abstract: Unintentional phosphate precipitation at water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) causes operation and maintenance challenges. With global phosphorus (P) scarcity looming and receiving water eutrophication caused by excess discharges of P, intentional P recovery at WRRFs has been gaining traction. To date, struvite recovery as slow release fertilizer has been the focus of P recovery. However, struvite recovery is not always the most cost-effective approach, especially when phosphate fertilizers cost consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, electrochemical processes for phosphorus recovery are also problematic due to the complicated operational processes (Peng, Dai, Wu, Peng, & Lu, 2018). Meanwhile, high phosphorus recovery efficiency could be achieved by crystallization with struvite precipitation, which could also generate valuable products and be not harmful to environment (Borojovich, Munster, Rafailov, & Porat, 2010; Dai, Lu, Peng, Zou, & Shi, 2016; Law & Pagilla 2018; Tarayre et al, 2016). Moreover, struvite was a crystalline solid containing 29% of P 2 O 5 (based on MgNH 4 PO 4 .6H 2 O) and could also be used as a slow‐release fertilizer (Hao, Wang, Loosdrecht, & Hu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, electrochemical processes for phosphorus recovery are also problematic due to the complicated operational processes (Peng, Dai, Wu, Peng, & Lu, 2018). Meanwhile, high phosphorus recovery efficiency could be achieved by crystallization with struvite precipitation, which could also generate valuable products and be not harmful to environment (Borojovich, Munster, Rafailov, & Porat, 2010; Dai, Lu, Peng, Zou, & Shi, 2016; Law & Pagilla 2018; Tarayre et al, 2016). Moreover, struvite was a crystalline solid containing 29% of P 2 O 5 (based on MgNH 4 PO 4 .6H 2 O) and could also be used as a slow‐release fertilizer (Hao, Wang, Loosdrecht, & Hu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wastewater biological P removal is often coupled with chemical P recovery strategies on P containing wastewater streams to either reduce the P amounts in the streams or to recover it for further use or both [72]. Current wastewater P recovery technologies mostly rely on chemical based struvite production [73]. Therefore, there is lot of future potential for developing and applying biological P recovery approaches for wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) [74], and here technologies that show potential will be shown.…”
Section: P In Wastewater and Sewage Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the procedures allowing for P recovery from waste streams, chemically induced crystallisation/precipitation/mineralisation of the already dissolved phosphate in the form of low soluble salts is one of the most common alternatives. Precipitation is achieved by appropriately supplying metal ions to the liquid phase, typically magnesium (Mg 2+ ), to form magnesium phosphate minerals (MgP) [11][12][13]; calcium (Ca 2+ ) to form calcium phosphate minerals (CaP) [14,15]; or iron (Fe 2+ ) to form iron phosphate minerals (FeP) [16][17][18][19][20]. In waste water treatment plants (WWTPs), this kind of process can be implemented at different locations [9,21] in order to foster resource recovery by producing a specific P-rich stream while meeting water quality standards of the receiving water bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%