“…This is partly due to its high mobility, and hence rapid redistribution after fire, which makes wildfire ash more challenging to collect than other components of the post-fire environment, such as fire-affected soils or the eroded sediment (Bodí et al, 2014). Over the last few years, however, research interest in wildfire ash has gained traction, with studies assessing ash chemical characteristics in a diverse range of ecosystems such as tropical and sub-tropical savannas (Brito et al, 2017;Brito et al, 2021;Caumo et al, 2022;Oliveira-Filho et al, 2018;Sánchez-García et al, 2021), tropical broadleaf forests (Audry et al, 2014), temperate eucalypt forests (Campos et al, 2015;Campos et al, 2016;Costa et al, 2014;Santín et al, 2012;2015b;2018;Silva et al, 2015;Wu et al 2017), Mediterranean and temperate conifer forests (Balfour & Woods, 2013;Harper et al, 2019;Pereira et al, 2012;Simon et al, 2016;Tsai et al, 2015;Quigley et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2015), temperate heathlands (Marcos et al, 2008), boreal forests (Kohl et al, 2019), and wetlands (Liu et al, 2010). This previous research indicated that ash chemical composition is highly heterogeneous even for ash from the same or similar ecosystems (Table 1).…”