2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/125296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater Using Oven-Dried Alum Sludge

Abstract: The present study deals with the removal of phosphorus from wastewater by using oven-dried alum sludge (ODS) as adsorbent that was collected from Al-Qadisiya treatment plant (Iraq); it was heated in an oven at 105• C for 24 h and then cooled at room temperature. The sludge particles were then crushed to produce a particle size of 0.5-4.75 mm. Two modes of operation are used, batch mode and fixed bed mode, in batch experiment the effect of oven-dried alum sludge doses 10-50 g/L, pH of solution 5-8 with constant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 that the higher the influent phosphorus concentration was, the faster the breakthrough and exhaustion took place. Higher retention rate and thus, earlier saturation might result from greater concentration gradient and smaller mass transfer resistance at higher phosphate concentration (Mohammed and Rashid, 2012;Paudyal et al, 2013). Similar tendency was reported by Zhang et al (2014) in case of removing phosphate using activated laterite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…3 that the higher the influent phosphorus concentration was, the faster the breakthrough and exhaustion took place. Higher retention rate and thus, earlier saturation might result from greater concentration gradient and smaller mass transfer resistance at higher phosphate concentration (Mohammed and Rashid, 2012;Paudyal et al, 2013). Similar tendency was reported by Zhang et al (2014) in case of removing phosphate using activated laterite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the treatment and disposal of excess sludge accounts for approximately 50-60% of the total cost of wastewater treatment. Conventional disposal methods, such as landfilling or ocean dumping, may cause secondary pollution problems and are strictly regulated in many countries [5][6][7]. For chemical precipitation process, the high sludge production and the associated disposal problems are also common concerns [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the influence of the AC properties on its adsorption capacity, the presence of other elements could also have influenced the adsorption performance of the sludges tested. For example, the high aluminium content of the sludges ( Table 2 ) may have influenced the adsorption process, although there appears little consensus in the literature on this influence [ 36 , 38 , 51 , 62 ]. On the one hand, aluminium has been indicated to improve the adsorption capacity of WTS (e.g., Lee et al [ 58 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sludge-based adsorbents have been reported in the literature for the removal of several pollutants from water treatment plants (WTPs) and WWTPs [ 36 , 37 ]. Research efforts, however, have focused on their removal efficacy for compounds like heavy metals [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], dyes [ 44 , 45 , 46 ], phenols [ 47 , 48 ], phosphorus and phosphate [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ] and antibiotics [ 53 ]. Consequently, the adsorbent potential of sludge for compounds like E2 and EE2 remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%