2003
DOI: 10.1038/nbt863
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphospecific proteolysis for mapping sites of protein phosphorylation

Abstract: Protein phosphorylation is a dominant mechanism of information transfer in cells, and a major goal of current proteomic efforts is to generate a system-level map describing all the sites of protein phosphorylation. Recent efforts have focused on developing technologies for enriching and quantifying phosphopeptides. Identification of the sites of phosphorylation typically relies on tandem mass spectrometry to sequence individual peptides. Here we describe an approach for phosphopeptide mapping that makes it pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
220
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
220
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the four conserved TQ sites were detected. We and others have suspected that the complete lack of positively charged residues in FUS LC obscures phosphorylation detection by standard proteomic workflows due to lack of positive residues both for efficient positive ion formation for mass spectrometry and for trypsin cleavage sites (Knight et al , 2003). Therefore, to determine the full possible extent of the FUS LC phosphorylation by DNA‐PK, we used in vitro DNA‐PK phosphorylation as described previously (Gardiner et al , 2008; Han et al , 2012; Deng et al , 2014) and detected phosphosites by two‐dimensional solution NMR, which offers direct residue resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the four conserved TQ sites were detected. We and others have suspected that the complete lack of positively charged residues in FUS LC obscures phosphorylation detection by standard proteomic workflows due to lack of positive residues both for efficient positive ion formation for mass spectrometry and for trypsin cleavage sites (Knight et al , 2003). Therefore, to determine the full possible extent of the FUS LC phosphorylation by DNA‐PK, we used in vitro DNA‐PK phosphorylation as described previously (Gardiner et al , 2008; Han et al , 2012; Deng et al , 2014) and detected phosphosites by two‐dimensional solution NMR, which offers direct residue resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By subsequently adding a chemical compound containing a free sulfhydryl group to dehydroalanine or b-methyldehydroalanine acid by Michael addition, a di-thiol is created in the peptide, which can serve as a cross-linker to a biotin-tag [98] or for direct affinity purification [99]. Knight and co-workers used the combination of b-elimination, Michael addition reaction and proteolysis to aid the assignment of phosphorylation sites using tandem MS analysis [100]. In this study, phosphoserine and phosphothreonine were converted to aminoethylcysteine and b-methylaminoethylcysteine, respectively, both targets for lysine specific proteases (e.g., trypsin, and lysyl endopeptidase (Lys-C)).…”
Section: Chemical Derivatization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the chosen label can also alter the protein/peptide behaviour during sample preparation. Addition of cysteamine as a nucleophile introduces a positive charge into the protein generating a new tryptic cleavage site [72,73]. Similarly a reaction with dimethyl-aminoethanethiol and subsequent oxidation yields the possibility for positive mode precursor ion scanning for 2-dimethylaminoethanesulfoxide at m/z = 122.06 Da obtained by low energy CID [74].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%