2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photo current metastability in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with controlled conduction band alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample in case iii was subjected to ultrasonic cleaning prior to the buffer deposition. The impact of treatments at the absorber interface on metastability has been noted in other experimental studies and may influence the growth of the film. Also, as mentioned earlier, buffer depositions are known to be sensitive to a number of conditions that are controlled only to the extent that is convenient with typical wet chemistry procedures.…”
Section: Jv Curves and Device Modeling Of Buffer Variationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The sample in case iii was subjected to ultrasonic cleaning prior to the buffer deposition. The impact of treatments at the absorber interface on metastability has been noted in other experimental studies and may influence the growth of the film. Also, as mentioned earlier, buffer depositions are known to be sensitive to a number of conditions that are controlled only to the extent that is convenient with typical wet chemistry procedures.…”
Section: Jv Curves and Device Modeling Of Buffer Variationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The hetero junction engineering by the CBO matching dominates both diode and photo currents, indicating that the CBO control is important to achieve high efficiency. Also, we pointed out that the CBO matching influenced photo J-V meta-stability so-called light soaking effect [11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Its electron affinity (χ = 3.80eV) is very close to that of optimized Zn 1-x Mg x O (χ=3.81eV) with 20%Mg. As shown in figure 1 there is a pretty good conduction band offset (CBO) between Si and ZnS: e.χ Si -e. χ ZnS = 0.15 eV According to Minemoto et al [7], CBO should be lower than 0.3eV to achieve adequate energy band alignment and avoid recombination losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%