2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photo-excited multi-frequency terahertz switch based on a composite metamaterial structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When σ Ge = 200 000 S/m, Ge is characterized by metal‐like property, and the absorber achieves a single‐band absorption with an absorptivity of 99.99% at 1.3896 THz, as shown by the blue hollow‐circle dash line in Figure . When applying 800 nm pump light, both the Si and Ge blocks are excited, assuming that the change in conductivity of Si and Ge is consistent, a single‐band absorption at 0.8340 THz with an absorptivity of 98.45% can be achieved when σ Si = σ Ge = 1 000 000 S/m, as plotted by red half‐empty triangle dot curve in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When σ Ge = 200 000 S/m, Ge is characterized by metal‐like property, and the absorber achieves a single‐band absorption with an absorptivity of 99.99% at 1.3896 THz, as shown by the blue hollow‐circle dash line in Figure . When applying 800 nm pump light, both the Si and Ge blocks are excited, assuming that the change in conductivity of Si and Ge is consistent, a single‐band absorption at 0.8340 THz with an absorptivity of 98.45% can be achieved when σ Si = σ Ge = 1 000 000 S/m, as plotted by red half‐empty triangle dot curve in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dielectric spacer is polyimide with a relative dielectric constant of ε = 3.5 and a loss tangent of tan δ = 0.003. The permittivities ε Si and ε Ge of Si and Ge are 11.7 and 16.3, respectively . The conductivities σ Si and σ Ge of Si and Ge can be tuned by pump light at different wavelengths.…”
Section: Structure and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A computational study that is based on maximizing the harmonic generation efficiency via a nonlinear programming algorithm is lacking [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Experimental studies usually focus on finding new techniques to increase the second and the third harmonic generation efficiency and there are relatively few experimental studies that have demonstrated a minor increase in the harmonic generation or conversion efficiency via certain experimental configurations and setups [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Some computational studies have focused on increasing the computation efficiency of harmonic generation problems rather than proving that the harmonic generation efficiency itself can actually be increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the studies mentioned in [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], which have managed to increase the efficiency of the nonlinear Finite-Difference-Time-Domain (FDTD) method by decreasing the dispersion error. The current literature of harmonic generation via nonlinear wave mixing is dominated by increasing the efficiency of the second/third harmonic generation rather than increasing the efficiency of an arbitrary harmonic [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. There are currently no known techniques in the literature that reported a high-efficiency in the microscale for an arbitrary harmonic generation (not necessarily the second harmonic) under monochromatic optical excitation [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%