2021
DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoacoustic microscopy: a novel approach for studying perforator skin flap in a mouse model

Abstract: Background: A comprehensive understanding of cutaneous microvessels is key to the design and use of the perforator skin flap. Compared with the various imaging technologies that have been applied in the clinical practice of the perforator skin flap, photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is a very promising noninvasive imaging modality with high resolution and deep penetration in biological tissues.Methods: PAM was employed to explore its multiple applications in a perforator skin flap. The following experiments were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade, ultrasound, x‐ray angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomographic angiography are the most often used imaging modalities for observing vessels [26]. However, there are some limitations in these imaging tools; for example, disappointing resolution makes it tough to offer detailed visualization of the angiogenesis of the skin autograft on early time points; and these approaches could not get images in a noninvasive and portable way; more importantly, x‐ray, MRA, and CTA demand to inject angiographic agents which actually interrupt the intrinsic physiology of vessel and impede the process of observation [27]. All of these show various intrinsic limitations; therefore, they are not able to obtain images in a noninvasive, dynamic, in vivo and real‐time way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, ultrasound, x‐ray angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomographic angiography are the most often used imaging modalities for observing vessels [26]. However, there are some limitations in these imaging tools; for example, disappointing resolution makes it tough to offer detailed visualization of the angiogenesis of the skin autograft on early time points; and these approaches could not get images in a noninvasive and portable way; more importantly, x‐ray, MRA, and CTA demand to inject angiographic agents which actually interrupt the intrinsic physiology of vessel and impede the process of observation [27]. All of these show various intrinsic limitations; therefore, they are not able to obtain images in a noninvasive, dynamic, in vivo and real‐time way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, various approaches used for flap design and use seem ineffective [19]. For example, few methods is satisfactory to easily, quickly and comfortably locate the perforators at both high resolution and depths; the evaluation of flap status and the time of flap division are often evaluated via convention and personal experience based on skin warmth, color, capillary refill and dermal bleeding, but these signs are subjective and have limited sensitivity and/or specificity [18, 20]. In addition, ultrasound, X‐ray, CTA, MRA, laser Doppler flow measurement and thermography also have many problems [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite flaps have broadly been used in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, there still remains challenging for us to have a comprehensive understanding of vascular supply which limits to locate the perforators, assess flap status and predict optimal division timing of pedicled flaps [15,18]. Currently, various approaches used for flap design and use seem ineffective [19].For example, few methods is satisfactory to easily, quickly and comfortably locate the perforators at both high resolution and depths; the evaluation of flap status and the time of flap division are often evaluated via convention and personal experience based on skin warmth, color, capillary refill and dermal bleeding, but these signs are subjective and have limited sensitivity and/or specificity [18,20]. In addition, ultrasound, X-ray, CTA, MRA, laser Doppler flow measurement and thermography also have many problems [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, NIR‐II imaging has not been used in a clinical environment, mainly because of a lack of suitable imaging instruments and optical probes. Most NIR imaging instruments are built for the laboratory, such as Bruker Xtreme, which is only suitable for small animals like mice [5]. The particular imaging platform and lack of portable CCD components restrict the application of NIR‐II/I imaging in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%