“…Hence, it is the most suited molecule for elucidating structural and functional properties by fluorescence, typically associated with membrane proteins. , However, tryptophan fluorescence is sensitive to micro-environmental changes during ligand binding, conformational alterations, protein denaturation, etc., affecting the overall fluorescence intensity. Further, it also shows a shift in the anisotropic properties of proteins upon a change in conformation. , In comparison, photoacoustic spectroscopy, which is based on the absorption of pulsed light by molecules and subsequent release of heat, generates a transient pressure pulse as acoustic signals, reflecting the molecular properties. , Therefore, assessing mitochondrial proteins by combining fluorescence and photoacoustic spectroscopy and capturing corresponding spectral signatures of tryptophan in vitro provides a better understanding of the dynamical status of mitochondria. The advantage of this combination is that fluorescence, in contrast to photoacoustic, is sensitive to the scattering loss by the tissue/medium before detection by the detector.…”