2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpap.2021.100024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photobiomodulation effects of pulsed-NIR laser (810 nm) and LED (808 ± 3 nm) with identical treatment regimen on burn wound healing: A quantitative label-free global proteomic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, although T6 and T9 yielded the same dose (0.3125 J/cm 2 ), the biological response of the cells behaved differently; after 48h, DPSCs cultured in 5% FBS in T6 (0.3 × 10 s) showed a significant increase in the proliferation rate of cells when cells compared to the control untreated group, while after 72 h, cells in the same group T6 showed a significant decrease in the proliferation rate compared to the control untreated group, and cells in group T9 (1 × 3 s) showed a significant increase in the proliferation rate of the treated cells. These current findings, which demonstrate the non-reciprocity effect of laser photobiomodulation on cells, confirm previous reports that demonstrated the nonlinear effect of laser photobiomodulation; even if the energy density is the same (inverse linear relationship between irradiance and time), the changes in biological endpoint will not necessarily be equal [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For instance, although T6 and T9 yielded the same dose (0.3125 J/cm 2 ), the biological response of the cells behaved differently; after 48h, DPSCs cultured in 5% FBS in T6 (0.3 × 10 s) showed a significant increase in the proliferation rate of cells when cells compared to the control untreated group, while after 72 h, cells in the same group T6 showed a significant decrease in the proliferation rate compared to the control untreated group, and cells in group T9 (1 × 3 s) showed a significant increase in the proliferation rate of the treated cells. These current findings, which demonstrate the non-reciprocity effect of laser photobiomodulation on cells, confirm previous reports that demonstrated the nonlinear effect of laser photobiomodulation; even if the energy density is the same (inverse linear relationship between irradiance and time), the changes in biological endpoint will not necessarily be equal [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Different approaches have been used to treat diabetic wounds, and when PBM is appropriately used, it elicits biostimulatory effects that speed up the healing process. PBM is principally a wavelength-dependent procedure involving photon-tissue interfaces [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported as a well-tolerated, safe and effective modality to manage OM related complications (12) owing to its anti-inflammatory (13) and antioxidant capabilities (14) . Furthermore, it has the ability to accelerate healing process through activating mitochondrial-ATP production, the local release of growth factors (15,16) , increased proliferation of fibroblasts (17,18) , improving extracellular matrix production, macrophage stimulation or activation of collagen production (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%