2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02852-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photobiomodulation therapy can change actin filaments of 3T3 mouse fibroblast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover the reduction of stress fiber-like structures observed in red PBM treated cells may be indicative of motile migrating cells, based on findings showing that cells with highly motility typically display few, thin and more dynamic stress fibers and that stress fiber are not essential for cell migration [57,58]. Our results concerning the impact of red PBM on cytoskeleton assembly properties of NIH/3T3 fibroblasts are in accordance with a very recent paper by de Magalhães and co-workers [59]. However, differently from our findings, these authors did not find any difference between the cell response, in terms of actin filament content, to red and NIR light.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover the reduction of stress fiber-like structures observed in red PBM treated cells may be indicative of motile migrating cells, based on findings showing that cells with highly motility typically display few, thin and more dynamic stress fibers and that stress fiber are not essential for cell migration [57,58]. Our results concerning the impact of red PBM on cytoskeleton assembly properties of NIH/3T3 fibroblasts are in accordance with a very recent paper by de Magalhães and co-workers [59]. However, differently from our findings, these authors did not find any difference between the cell response, in terms of actin filament content, to red and NIR light.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, differently from our findings, these authors did not find any difference between the cell response, in terms of actin filament content, to red and NIR light. This may be explained, in addition to the different PBM parameters applied, by the difference in cell growth substrate rigidity, i.e., gel in the work by Magalhães et al versus plastic or glass in our work [59][60][61]. Concomitantly, cells irradiated with violet-blue and NIR light exhibited augmented expression of focal adhesion proteins namely vinculin, which appeared mainly aggregated at the end of stress fiber-like structures, and p-FAK which, among other functions, is required for stress fiber formation in fibroblasts [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, in this particular scenario with varying wavelengths on dentin differentiation, we examined photon energy transfer (PET) noted at 810 nm to further assess responses at individual photon energy. This appears to be particularly relevant given the extremely low, efficacious PBM clinical doses and the antagonistic effects at higher doses termed the Arndt‐Schultz dose curve [32, 42, 43]. Following the physical transfer of light energy, its transformation leads to thermal, biochemical or biophysical changes that contribute to the directed PBM therapeutic responses (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An indirect effect of PBM on the phosphorylation of protein kinase Cδ, which is involved in cell survival, was detected [ 21 ]. Recently, de Magalhaes et al reported that PBM can alter the morphological characteristics of cells and their cytoskeleton [ 22 ]. Mokoena et al showed that α-smooth muscle actin increased in an injured model after stimulation by PBM [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%