2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02949274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photobioreactor engineering: Design and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
76
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the points mentioned such as high costs are still critical issues. Other reviews [2][3][4][5] mark the beginning of a new awakening in rational photobioreactor design. Basic process engineering principles regarding light distribution, mass transfer, and hydrodynamics have been set up e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the points mentioned such as high costs are still critical issues. Other reviews [2][3][4][5] mark the beginning of a new awakening in rational photobioreactor design. Basic process engineering principles regarding light distribution, mass transfer, and hydrodynamics have been set up e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the closed photobioreactor has a higher harvesting efficiency (more biomass) and a good control on culture parameters (temperature, pH, CO 2 concentration etc.) (Suh & Lee, 2003), its capital costs remain higher (around 10 times) than those of open ponds (Carvalho et al, 2006). However, the combination of ponds and photobioreactors can be profitable because microalgae can be grown in open ponds while reducing contamination by undesired species (Huntley & Redalje, 2008).…”
Section: Culture Of Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial cultivation of microalgae ought to reproduce and enhance the optimum natural growth conditions (Brennan and Owende 2010;Vasumathi et al 2012). Two systems that have been extensively proposed are based on open pond and closed PBR technologies (Molina et al 2001;Suh and Lee 2003;Chisti 2008;Brennan and Owende 2010). However, there is ongoing debate pertaining to which of the open pond or closed PBR would be a better system for CO 2 sequestration.…”
Section: Propagation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%