2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2021.106372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction to HCOOH over core-shell Cu@Cu2O catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formic acid formation was also observed in experiments via photoreduction of CO 2 on a core−shell Cu@Cu 2 O catalyst. 35 However, in our calculations to decompose formic acid to CO and H 2 O, we found that the reaction barrier was close to 4.0 eV; similarly, decomposing the formate group to CO and OH is also very unfavorable. Our calculations thus suggest that H-assisted CO 2 dissociation to CO on Cu 2 O is less likely via the formation of formate or carbonyl.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formic acid formation was also observed in experiments via photoreduction of CO 2 on a core−shell Cu@Cu 2 O catalyst. 35 However, in our calculations to decompose formic acid to CO and H 2 O, we found that the reaction barrier was close to 4.0 eV; similarly, decomposing the formate group to CO and OH is also very unfavorable. Our calculations thus suggest that H-assisted CO 2 dissociation to CO on Cu 2 O is less likely via the formation of formate or carbonyl.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that, as an alternate reaction path, the H-assisted CO 2 dissociation on the perfect (111) Cu 2 O facet was previously studied, and it was shown that it required more than 3.2 eV to form a carbonyl group (COOH*) on the Cu 2 O­(111) surface, while it was easier to form a formate group (HCOO*) and formic acid (HCOOH*). The formic acid formation was also observed in experiments via photoreduction of CO 2 on a core–shell Cu@Cu 2 O catalyst . However, in our calculations to decompose formic acid to CO and H 2 O, we found that the reaction barrier was close to 4.0 eV; similarly, decomposing the formate group to CO and OH is also very unfavorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 193 ] The synergistic effect between Cu nanoparticles/clusters and Cu 2 O can positively affect CO 2 reduction. [ 180,194,195 ] Deng et al. loaded Cu nanoparticles on Cu 2 O (111) for photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 to produce methane.…”
Section: Characteristics and Modification Strategies Of Cu2o‐based Ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…prepared a Cu 2 O substrate with 3D porous structure and loaded Cu and UiO‐66‐NH 2 on its surface to construct an indirect Z‐scheme heterojunction. [ 194 ] Under the optimal conditions, the yield of CO reached 4.54 µmol g −1 h −1 , which was 50.4 times and 37.8 times higher than that of Cu 2 O and UiO‐66‐NH 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Application Of Cu2o‐based Catalysts In Co2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation