“…In the photocatalytic oxidation, the ultraviolet (UV) radiation with energy above the band-gap of titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) (wavelength < 385 nm) can induce the formation of electron-hole pairs and generate hydroxyl radicals further on the UV-illuminated TiO 2 surface, and then the oxidation of organic contaminants to H 2 O, CO 2 and other final products is mediated by hydroxyl radicals (Anpo et al, 1991;Yu et al, 2006b;Zuo et al, 2006;Hodgson et al, 2007;Yu and Lee, 2007;Mo et al, 2009Sun et al, 2010Yu et al, 2010;Kandiel et al, 2013;Klementova and Zlamal, 2013;Silva et al, 2013). The key photocatalytic oxidation and reduction processes in the degradation of formaldehyde can be expressed as what follows (Noguchi and Fujishima, 1998;Ao et al, 2004) A variety of photocatalytic reactors have been designed for indoor air purification, such as plate (Yu et al, 2006b;Zuo et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007b;Yu and Lee, 2007;Chen et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2010), honeycomb monolith (Hodgson et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2014), annular (Yang et al, 2007a;Shie et al, 2008), packed-bed (Han et al, 2012), and optical fiber (Bourgeois et al, 2012). Among these reactors, the performances of plate [once-flow removal efficiency (ORE): 11-19.6% (Yang et al, 2007b); 50% (Chen et al, 2009)] and annular [ORE: 8-14% (Yang et al, 2007a)] reactors on formaldehyde decomposition were lower than those of the packed-bed [ORE: 40-90% (Han et al, 2012)], optical fiber [ORE: 60% (Bourgeois et al, 2012)] and the honeycomb monolith type [ORE: 35-86% (Hodgson et al, 2007;…”