2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocatalytic purification of volatile organic compounds in indoor air: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
451
1
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 755 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
5
451
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…An acclimation period with lower removal efficiency (RE) of VOCs was necessary for microorganisms according our previous study [14]. For PCO, photocatalyst deactivation could result in the gradual decrease of its photocatalytic activity as observed in many researches [17,27,28]. Therefore, it is considered that single biological or PCO is not so perfect for organic waste gas treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An acclimation period with lower removal efficiency (RE) of VOCs was necessary for microorganisms according our previous study [14]. For PCO, photocatalyst deactivation could result in the gradual decrease of its photocatalytic activity as observed in many researches [17,27,28]. Therefore, it is considered that single biological or PCO is not so perfect for organic waste gas treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, biological and photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) have becoming attractive techniques for this purpose due to their low energy consumption, relatively moderate operating costs and minimal byproduct generation [11]. Moreover, these two techniques can decompose VOCs to nontoxic final products such as CO 2 and H 2 O at ambient temperatures [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Several researches have been found that a large number of VOCs, like benzene [18,19], toluene [20,21], xylene [1,22] and styrene [23,24] could be removed by single biological or PCO purification technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) is an effective method to degrade NH 3 , but the oxidation reaction generally requires a high temperature [5][6][7]. Photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) could eliminate the indoor air pollutants such as formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds under ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation at ambient temperature; therefore, it is a promising method for indoor air NH 3 destruction [8][9][10][11]. A few studies have been focused on the photocatalytic removal of gaseous NH 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, thermal methods act to break down contaminants but require significant energy input for heating: temperatures in the range of 200-250°C for processes incorporating catalysts [3] and a range of730-850°C for those processes not incorporating catalysts [4]; furthermore, there is the potential for harmful side-product formation (e.g., NO x and S02) from the thermal process which requires subsequent purification [5]. An emerging alternative method for air pollution control employs the use of semiconductors in photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) of organic contaminants to produce innocuous CO 2 and H 2 0 [1,6,7] . The primary advantages ofPCO over the aforementioned technologies are the use of non-expendable materials and low energy demand because the process operates at or near room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%