2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-012-0115-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using Co3O4 nanoparticles under visible light irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though this material has been widely used for water splitting and water oxidation, this is the first time MeOH production is reported when Co 3 O 4 is used as a photocatalyst in a system as described herein. It is noteworthy that the reaction product obtained here is different from those reported in the two previous works using Co 3 O 4 as a photocatalyst, which at the same time are different from each other [40,41]. This apparent discrepancy may be explained, since different excitation conditions were used in every report: (i) In the work of Mendoza et al [40], the irradiation was carried out using a small window of the visible spectrum (510 to 620 nm); the light intensity in the reaction medium was not reported.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Co 2 Reductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Though this material has been widely used for water splitting and water oxidation, this is the first time MeOH production is reported when Co 3 O 4 is used as a photocatalyst in a system as described herein. It is noteworthy that the reaction product obtained here is different from those reported in the two previous works using Co 3 O 4 as a photocatalyst, which at the same time are different from each other [40,41]. This apparent discrepancy may be explained, since different excitation conditions were used in every report: (i) In the work of Mendoza et al [40], the irradiation was carried out using a small window of the visible spectrum (510 to 620 nm); the light intensity in the reaction medium was not reported.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Co 2 Reductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the reaction product obtained here is different from those reported in the two previous works using Co 3 O 4 as a photocatalyst, which at the same time are different from each other [40,41]. This apparent discrepancy may be explained, since different excitation conditions were used in every report: (i) In the work of Mendoza et al [40], the irradiation was carried out using a small window of the visible spectrum (510 to 620 nm); the light intensity in the reaction medium was not reported. (ii) In the report of Huang et al [41], a Xe lamp was used to irradiate the reaction system at an intensity of 9 mW/cm 2 and the photoelectrode was polarized at 0.9 V (vs. SCE) during the experiments.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Co 2 Reductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations