2010
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2010.487720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photochemical Behavior of the Insecticide Methomyl Under Different Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results (Table 2) showed that the degradation of methomyl was much faster with ZnO than with TiO 2 . The IC results confirmed that mineralization of methomyl led to the formation of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium ions during the all investigated processes (Tomašević et al, 2010a(Tomašević et al, , 2010bTomašević, 2011). (Tomašević, 2011 Fig.…”
Section: Methomylsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results (Table 2) showed that the degradation of methomyl was much faster with ZnO than with TiO 2 . The IC results confirmed that mineralization of methomyl led to the formation of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium ions during the all investigated processes (Tomašević et al, 2010a(Tomašević et al, , 2010bTomašević, 2011). (Tomašević, 2011 Fig.…”
Section: Methomylsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…4), reaction temperature and pH. The photocatalytic removal of the methomyl from aqueous solutions upon UV/Vis (366 and 300-400 nm) and natural solar light in the presence of TiO 2 and ZnO has been examined (Tomašević et al, 2009b(Tomašević et al, , 2010aTomašević, 2011) and the influence of reaction conditions (initial concentration of methomyl, catalysts type and concentration, pH, presence of Clions) were studied. The results (Table 2) showed that the degradation of methomyl was much faster with ZnO than with TiO 2 .…”
Section: Methomylmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct photolysis is negligible because methomyl's molar extinction coef fi cient is low for wavelengths higher than 290 nm (Tamimi et al 2006 ) ; the wavelength spectrum for methomyl in aqueous solution is in the range of 200-300 nm, whereas the solar spectrum ranges from 300 to 600 nm (Malato et al 2002 ) . Tomasevic et al ( 2010 ) investigated the in fl uence of water quality on photolytic degradation (at 254 nm) and found that the t 1/2 of technical grade methomyl in distilled water (79.7 min; pH 5.5) was lower than that in either seawater (123 min; pH 7.9) or deionized water (97.6 min; pH 5.2). Furthermore, degradation appears to be governed by pseudo-fi rst order kinetics, whether alone or in the presence of photosensitizers such as TiO 2 or ZnO (ZnO proved to be a better catalyst; Tomasevic et al 2010 ) .…”
Section: Photolysismentioning
confidence: 99%