2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photochemical removal of NO2 by using 172-nm Xe2 excimer lamp in N2 or air at atmospheric pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Light-induced advanced oxidation processes have demonstrated good development prospects in the area of emission reduction of NO x and SO 2 from flue gas. ,,,,, Several semiconductor-based photocatalytic oxidation processes have been developed for removal of NO x and SO 2 from flue gas and have exhibited good removal performance for NO x and SO 2 . , However, some drawbacks, such as instability and low activity of photocatalyst, low penetration of UV light in solids, and restriction of low concentrations of pollutants (photocatalytic oxidation processes can be only used for the treatment of pollutants with low concentration), hinder their industrial applications. , In recent years, several photochemical oxidation processes, such as dry VUV radiation, , wet UV–H 2 O 2 ,, and wet UV–Fenton­(-like) processes, ,, have been developed to remove NO x and SO 2 from flue gas. Tsuji et al successfully used 172 nm Xe 2 and 146 nm Kr 2 excimer lamps as VUV sources to remove SO 2 , NO, and NO 2 in N 2 and air without using any expensive catalysts, which shows that VUV is an effective light source for the removal of SO 2 , NO, and NO 2 . However, Tsuji’s studies did not consider the effect of VUV irradiation in the simultaneous presence of O 2 and H 2 O, which are the two main components of actual flue gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light-induced advanced oxidation processes have demonstrated good development prospects in the area of emission reduction of NO x and SO 2 from flue gas. ,,,,, Several semiconductor-based photocatalytic oxidation processes have been developed for removal of NO x and SO 2 from flue gas and have exhibited good removal performance for NO x and SO 2 . , However, some drawbacks, such as instability and low activity of photocatalyst, low penetration of UV light in solids, and restriction of low concentrations of pollutants (photocatalytic oxidation processes can be only used for the treatment of pollutants with low concentration), hinder their industrial applications. , In recent years, several photochemical oxidation processes, such as dry VUV radiation, , wet UV–H 2 O 2 ,, and wet UV–Fenton­(-like) processes, ,, have been developed to remove NO x and SO 2 from flue gas. Tsuji et al successfully used 172 nm Xe 2 and 146 nm Kr 2 excimer lamps as VUV sources to remove SO 2 , NO, and NO 2 in N 2 and air without using any expensive catalysts, which shows that VUV is an effective light source for the removal of SO 2 , NO, and NO 2 . However, Tsuji’s studies did not consider the effect of VUV irradiation in the simultaneous presence of O 2 and H 2 O, which are the two main components of actual flue gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have inferred that VUV light irradiation may directly decompose SO 2 and NO by oxidation removal reactions . This assumption was verified by the experimental results of Tsuji, where they found the deposition of sulfur powders on the walls of the reaction chamber after photolysis of SO 2 in N 2 under VUV irradiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some researchers have inferred that VUV light irradiation may directly decompose SO 2 and NO by oxidation removal reactions . This assumption was verified by the experimental results of Tsuji, where they found the deposition of sulfur powders on the walls of the reaction chamber after photolysis of SO 2 in N 2 under VUV irradiation. normalSO2+normalhυ()λ<2000.1emnormalnmS+O2· normalSO2+normalhυ()λ<2000.1emnormalnmSO+·O SO+normalhυ()λ<2000.1emnormalnmS+·O NO+normalhυ()λ<2000.1emnormalnmN·+·O N·+N·N2 ·O+·OO2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, whether it favours reducing by‐product formation such as O 3 and NO x compared with DBD alone was unclear. To our knowledge, direct UV photolysis by excilamps in the gas phase was much lower . Specifically, no study has reported removing VOCs in polluted air using KrCl* and XeCl* excilamps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%