1993
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(93)90540-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoconductivity spectrum, deformation potentials and effective masses of carriers for the chalcopyrite semiconductor alloy CuIn0.6Ga0.4Se2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The under concentration increased photon flux density does not only influence I sc and U oc (eq. , 1.3), but also the electric conditions in the device start to change, what finally results in different bulk conductivities and screening lengths for electric potentials and shunts . In Figure , the relative changes in U oc are plotted against the logarithm of the light concentration factor for three differently sized lamellar cells out of series C. The U oc ‐trend of a dot‐shaped micro cell with 750‐µm active area radius is also shown for comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The under concentration increased photon flux density does not only influence I sc and U oc (eq. , 1.3), but also the electric conditions in the device start to change, what finally results in different bulk conductivities and screening lengths for electric potentials and shunts . In Figure , the relative changes in U oc are plotted against the logarithm of the light concentration factor for three differently sized lamellar cells out of series C. The U oc ‐trend of a dot‐shaped micro cell with 750‐µm active area radius is also shown for comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both trends can explain the observed changes in FF and were related first to a light induced increase in conductivity and second to changes in the inner electrical fields of the diode. Both effects are expected and well known for photoactive semiconductors and Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 in particular [9,[30][31][32][33]. It is further to consider, that the finally estimated R s and R p values reflect the sum of different particular single serial and parallel resistances that vary on the material, contacts and geometry used and that may change differently during concentration.…”
Section: Lamellar Microcells At Concentrated Light Test Conditions (Cmentioning
confidence: 86%