2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocurrent Spectroscopy of Perovskite Layers and Solar Cells: A Sensitive Probe of Material Degradation

Abstract: Optical absorptance spectroscopy of polycrystalline CHNHPbI films usually indicates the presence of a PbI phase, either as a preparation residue or due to film degradation, but gives no insight on how this may affect electrical properties. Here, we apply photocurrent spectroscopy to both perovskite solar cells and coplanar-contacted layers at various stages of degradation. In both cases, we find that the presence of a PbI phase restricts charge-carrier transport, suggesting that PbI encapsulates CHNHPbI grains… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FTPS, on the other hand, is sensitive only to the absorption contributing to photocurrent and may, therefore, be sensitive to deep defects in the main photoactive phase (CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 ). Moreover, in agreement with our previous report, 40 we assume that both electrons and holes have to be collected, and because of the short lifetime of electron−hole pairs inside of the PbI 2 phase, this effectively suppresses any possible photogeneration inside of the PbI 2 phase. This can already be seen from the comparison of FTPS spectra of the fresh samples scaled at their maximum in the upper panel of Figure 7.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FTPS, on the other hand, is sensitive only to the absorption contributing to photocurrent and may, therefore, be sensitive to deep defects in the main photoactive phase (CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 ). Moreover, in agreement with our previous report, 40 we assume that both electrons and holes have to be collected, and because of the short lifetime of electron−hole pairs inside of the PbI 2 phase, this effectively suppresses any possible photogeneration inside of the PbI 2 phase. This can already be seen from the comparison of FTPS spectra of the fresh samples scaled at their maximum in the upper panel of Figure 7.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The parasitic absorption of a thin layer of unreacted PbI 2 that does not contribute to photocurrent is indicated by the yellow area. However, interestingly, thanks to charge transfer between PbI 2 and CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 , this layer does not hinder carrier extraction from the CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 phase. Figure shows that also in the case of the two-step sample at least 80% of blue LED light (2.64 eV) reaches the CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 phase, so that both two-step and single-step cases are comparable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The slope of this linear behavior gives a direct access to the product αk 2 . The absorption coefficient can be measured via other methods such as Fourier transform photocurrent spectroscopy [42,43] or ellipsometry [44]. Therefore, one can extract a direct measurement of the external radiative recombination rate k 2 .…”
Section: A the Drift-diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-bandgap absorptance spectroscopy is a relatively simple defect quantification method, which is well established in the material science of thin-film photovoltaic (PV) materials, such as microcrystalline silicon [1], hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) [2], organic semiconductors [3] and also recently hybrid perovskite materials [4][5][6][7]. Whereas other methods, such as conductivity or photoluminescence, are difficult to interpret and may give results affected by transient effects, sub-bandgap absorptance photoluminescence, are difficult to interpret and may give results affected by transient effects, subbandgap absorptance spectroscopy can already provide a relatively universal indication of semiconductor quality by looking at the sub-bandgap absorptance and the steepness of the absorption edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of FTPS compared to PDS is the ability to measure the defect density of absorber layers in complete solar cells. In hybrid perovskites, the main difference might be the lead iodide phase that exhibits differently [4,6,7], while in the case of a-Si:H the main difference is the sensitivity to the surface defects, that is higher in PDS, but can also distort FTPS spectra (see Figure 1a). Surface defect absorption may lead to erroneous features on the apparent (as evaluated) absorption coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%