2011
DOI: 10.1159/000323811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Intravitreal Injection of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Abstract: Background/Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (anti-VEGF) antibody in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients with PCV followed for 12 months after combination therapy with PDT and anti-VEGF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received intravitreal anti-VEGF (1.25 mg bevacizumab or 0.5 mg ranibizumab) within 7 days after PDT. Retreatment with PDT a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approval for this retrospective review was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of our institution. The inclusion criteria for this study were the same as in our previous study [17], that is: (1) symptomatic macular PCV; (2) presence of exudative or haemorrhagic features involving the macula on fundus examination, and (3) presence of polypoidal lesions and BVNs in indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Exclusion criteria were: (1) any systemic contraindications for verteporfin or angiographic dyes; (2) previous treatment for PCV, such as focal laser photocoagulation; (3) presence of other diseases such as age-related macular degeneration or pathological myopia (spherical equivalent, ≤–6 dpt); (4) retinal pigment epithelial tears, and (5) other maculopathies, such as diabetic maculopathy or retinal vascular occlusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approval for this retrospective review was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of our institution. The inclusion criteria for this study were the same as in our previous study [17], that is: (1) symptomatic macular PCV; (2) presence of exudative or haemorrhagic features involving the macula on fundus examination, and (3) presence of polypoidal lesions and BVNs in indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Exclusion criteria were: (1) any systemic contraindications for verteporfin or angiographic dyes; (2) previous treatment for PCV, such as focal laser photocoagulation; (3) presence of other diseases such as age-related macular degeneration or pathological myopia (spherical equivalent, ≤–6 dpt); (4) retinal pigment epithelial tears, and (5) other maculopathies, such as diabetic maculopathy or retinal vascular occlusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we reported the results of a 12-month follow-up of PCV patients who underwent PDT combined with anti-VEGF [17]. As an extension of that study, the present one investigated whether the efficacy of this treatment extended beyond 1 year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A survey was done to evaluate the effect of low-fluency Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) [51,69,70] on central retinal sensitivity and fixation stability as compared with standard-fluency PDT for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). The study shows a significant improvement in macular sensitivity after PDT in eyes with chronic CSC, with greater efficacy in low-fluency-treated eyes.…”
Section: Therapies In Ophthalmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although anti-VEGF antibodies have a much longer history of application in combined therapy, the optimal time of antibodies before or after PDT is still controversial. Most of those studies utilized intravitreal antibodies before PDT ( Gomi et al, 2010 , 2015 ; Nowak-Sliwinska et al, 2010 ; Park and Kim, 2012 ; Sagong et al, 2012 ; Saito et al, 2012 , 2014 ; Tomita et al, 2012 ; Jeon et al, 2013 ; Sato et al, 2013 ; Yoshida et al, 2013 ; Sakurai et al, 2014 ), and a few studies applied antibodies after PDT ( Lai et al, 2011 ; Ho et al, 2014 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ) or in the same day ( Kim et al, 2011 ; Moon et al, 2011 ; Ricci et al, 2012 ; Hata et al, 2015 ). Due to that there are great differences among them in regarding to anti-VEGF antibodies, time interval between PDT and intravitreal antibodies, PDT protocol and retreatment protocols, it is unable to conduct sub-group analysis and determine the best option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%