2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2010.2041786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoelastic Stress Analysis Error Quantification in Vasculature Models for Robot Feedback Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After measuring the photoelastic coefficient and the blue light transmittance coefficient of urethane elastomer, there was an average error of 3.9% in stress magnitude measurements for the pressure range of 60-200 mmHg (Tercero et al 2010), Figure 4. In this polariscope the relation between the green light intensity and retardation is described by:…”
Section: Overview Of Photoelastic Stress Analysis On Vasculature Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After measuring the photoelastic coefficient and the blue light transmittance coefficient of urethane elastomer, there was an average error of 3.9% in stress magnitude measurements for the pressure range of 60-200 mmHg (Tercero et al 2010), Figure 4. In this polariscope the relation between the green light intensity and retardation is described by:…”
Section: Overview Of Photoelastic Stress Analysis On Vasculature Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C ¼ 1.284 Â 10 À9 Pa À1 was measured for this material in (Tercero et al 2010). For this material D can measured using the blue light transmittance as described in (Tercero et al 2010).…”
Section: Stress Analysis During Micro-coil Deployment In Saccular Anementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations