2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-010-4154-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoelectron spectroscopy of terpenoids and prediction of their rate constants in atmospheric oxidation reactions

Abstract: The electronic structures of six mono-terpenoids and two of their oxygenated derivatives were studied by He I photoelectron spectroscopy (PES). The observed bands were interpreted on the basis of empirical arguments and theoretical calculations. The first vertical ionization potentials for β -pinene, α-terpinene, terpinolene, γ -terpinene, limonene, myrcene, citral, and terpinene-4-ol were determined to be 8. 73, 7.57, 8.26, 8.30, 8.53, 8.68, 8.71, and 8.77 eV, respectively. Most of these values have not been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for trans ‐cyclooctene, α ‐pinene, and β ‐pinene, we computed excitation energies that arrive to 8.5 eV; at this point, we believe it to be important to carry out a deeper analysis as to whether this phenomenon affects our results. For these compounds, the experimental vertical IEs of 8.72, 8.38, and 8.73 eV are about 2.2 eV larger than the corresponding ones predicted in this work by B3LYP functional (−ε HOMO = 6.43, 6.21, and 6.54 eV, respectively), whereas, the CAM‐B3LYP functional predicts the IEs at 7.94, 7.70, and 8.04 eV, respectively. Similar findings were described by Lehtonen et al studying the electronic excitation spectra of trans ‐1,3‐butadiene and trans ‐2‐propeniminium with various functionals.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…As for trans ‐cyclooctene, α ‐pinene, and β ‐pinene, we computed excitation energies that arrive to 8.5 eV; at this point, we believe it to be important to carry out a deeper analysis as to whether this phenomenon affects our results. For these compounds, the experimental vertical IEs of 8.72, 8.38, and 8.73 eV are about 2.2 eV larger than the corresponding ones predicted in this work by B3LYP functional (−ε HOMO = 6.43, 6.21, and 6.54 eV, respectively), whereas, the CAM‐B3LYP functional predicts the IEs at 7.94, 7.70, and 8.04 eV, respectively. Similar findings were described by Lehtonen et al studying the electronic excitation spectra of trans ‐1,3‐butadiene and trans ‐2‐propeniminium with various functionals.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Finally, the sum of the two ion-signal intensities was calculated, leading to a better statistic, and compared it to the literature (Figure 2). 7,11,13,14,22 Our experimental IE value is in very good agreement with tabulated ones, validating our experimental approach. It must be noted that Fang et al 12 obtained a significant lower value, i.e.…”
Section: Limonenesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The experimental set-up was first tested with limonene, for which photoelectron spectra 7,11,14 or photoionization efficiency curves 12,13 have already been published. Below 8.4 eV, only low signal-to-noise ratios were recorded.…”
Section: Limonenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar argument holds for a-terpinene, for which the photoelectron spectrum shows a gap of about 3 eV between the first and second peaks. [32] This can be interpreted in terms of the D 0 -D 1 energy difference. While a photoelectron spectrum is not available for a-phellandrene, it is reasonable to expect that the D 0 -D 1 gap is similar (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%