“…As for trans ‐cyclooctene, α ‐pinene, and β ‐pinene, we computed excitation energies that arrive to 8.5 eV; at this point, we believe it to be important to carry out a deeper analysis as to whether this phenomenon affects our results. For these compounds, the experimental vertical IEs of 8.72, 8.38, and 8.73 eV are about 2.2 eV larger than the corresponding ones predicted in this work by B3LYP functional (−ε HOMO = 6.43, 6.21, and 6.54 eV, respectively), whereas, the CAM‐B3LYP functional predicts the IEs at 7.94, 7.70, and 8.04 eV, respectively. Similar findings were described by Lehtonen et al studying the electronic excitation spectra of trans ‐1,3‐butadiene and trans ‐2‐propeniminium with various functionals.…”