1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.178.966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoemission from Clean and Cesium-Covered Nickel Surfaces

Abstract: Photoemission energy distributions (PED) have been measured for clean and cesium-covered singlecrystal Ni(lll) surfaces. The surface condition was monitored during the experiments with a low-energy electron-diffraction (LEED) apparatus. Photoemission results for the clean surface are similar to those previously reported for polycrystalline material, except that minor structure resulting from direct transitions was observed, and a much higher work function of 5.42=fc0.04 eV was obtained for the (111) surface th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the shift of the SRT is the modification of the magnetic surface anisotropy, which depends on the chemical composition of the surface layer. Cs deposition changes the occupation of the atomic orbitals of the surface layer owing to hybridization 14,15 . However, the domain patterns and the evolution of the patterns relative to the SRT remain unaffected motivating the introduction of an effective temperature, where the real temperature as well as the thickness are incorporated on an equal footing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the shift of the SRT is the modification of the magnetic surface anisotropy, which depends on the chemical composition of the surface layer. Cs deposition changes the occupation of the atomic orbitals of the surface layer owing to hybridization 14,15 . However, the domain patterns and the evolution of the patterns relative to the SRT remain unaffected motivating the introduction of an effective temperature, where the real temperature as well as the thickness are incorporated on an equal footing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest to nano‐optics are the plasmons localized at a surface or in a particle, both of which may be accompanied by a field enhancement 1–4 of up to 100 times compared to the amplitude of the exciting wave. Surface plasmons play a key role in the optical properties of small structures as well as in electron tunnelling 5, field ion and photoemission 6, 7, van der Waals forces 8, surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) 9 and recently in tip‐enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) 1–4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I propose that these peaks are associated with Cs-induced surface states instead of surface plasmons as proposed by Callcott and McRae. 6 Application of LCMTO to thin films proceeds exactly as in solids except that the layer structure constants of Kambe 7 are used in place of the bulk structure constant of Ham and Segall. 8 The method of constructing wave functions and potentials has already been described in an application 9 to Cu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 They find their spectra to depend on the amount of Cs deposited on the Ni(lll) surface. I suggest that the peak at -4.5 eV for what they refer to as clean Ni is actually due to small amounts of contaminant such as O or Cs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%