2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:mete.0000047705.04173.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoemission Temperature Measurement. Two Approaches to the Determination of the Procedural Error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The body temperature measured by the photoemission method, just as the color temperature, is higher than its actual temperature. The procedural errors of measuring the tungsten temperature at 1200, 1800, and 2600 K, determined by the technique of [2,3], are equal to 1.0. 1.9, and 6.0 K, when the device with a bialkali photocathode was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The body temperature measured by the photoemission method, just as the color temperature, is higher than its actual temperature. The procedural errors of measuring the tungsten temperature at 1200, 1800, and 2600 K, determined by the technique of [2,3], are equal to 1.0. 1.9, and 6.0 K, when the device with a bialkali photocathode was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Laser pulse (1), response of the photomultiplier (2), and the surface temperature of a tungsten plate 60 μm thick during the first 100 μs of laser pulse action(3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%