2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoevaporation of protoplanetary discs – II. Evolutionary models and observable properties

Abstract: We present a new model for protoplanetary disc evolution. This model combines viscous evolution with photoevaporation of the disc. However, in a companion paper we have shown that at late times such models must consider the effect of stellar radiation directly incident on the inner disc edge, and here we model the observational implications of this process. We find that the entire disc is dispersed on a time‐scale of the order of 105 yr after a disc lifetime of a few Myr, consistent with observations of T Taur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
442
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 470 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(131 reference statements)
24
442
3
Order By: Relevance
“…68. Numerical simulations confirm this behavior and suggest that at the end of the disk lifetime (several Myr), the disk rapidly disperses within ∼ > 10 5 yr (Alexander et al 2006b). EUV (Ly continuum) radiation is problematic because it may not reach the disk at all if disk winds absorb them early on.…”
Section: Epj Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…68. Numerical simulations confirm this behavior and suggest that at the end of the disk lifetime (several Myr), the disk rapidly disperses within ∼ > 10 5 yr (Alexander et al 2006b). EUV (Ly continuum) radiation is problematic because it may not reach the disk at all if disk winds absorb them early on.…”
Section: Epj Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recent detection of [Ne II] emission lines Herczeg et al 2007;Najita et al 2009) has been interpreted as evidence for irradiation of the disc's atmosphere by energetic photons (extreme ultraviolet or X-ray) and possibly associated photoevaporation (Alexander et al 2006b;Pascucci et al 2007). presented a self-consistent hydrodynamic model of an X-EUV driven photoevaporation wind, obtaining mass-loss rates of 1.4×10 −8 M yr −1 occurring over a large radial extent of 1-70 AU.…”
Section: X-ray Photoevaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kenyon & Hartmann 1995;Luhman et al 2010;. Such observed twotimescale behaviour has favoured the development of disc dispersal models that involve a rapid disc clearing phase, contrary to the predictions of simple viscous draining, and in agreement with photoevaporation (Clarke et al 2001;Alexander et al 2006a;Alexander et al 2006b;Ercolano 2008;Ercolano et al 2009;Gorti et al 2009;Owen et al 2010;Owen et al 2011b;Owen et al 2012) or possibly planet formation (Armitage & Hansen 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Models that produce an inside-out dispersal of disks include the effects of photoevaporation by stellar X-ray and UV radiation (e.g., Alexander et al 2006;Gorti & Hollenbach 2009;Owen et al 2010). In these models, disk gaps are opened where thermal heating launches the gas into a photoevaporative wind by providing enough energy to exceed the gravitational potential of the star.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%