2000
DOI: 10.13182/nse00-a2164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photofission Cross Sections for237Np in the Energy Interval from 5.27 to 10.83 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) In the first place, there are several works presenting calculations of fission barrier heights, using semimicroscopic models based on the Strutinsky [26][27][28] and Hartree-Fock [29,30] methods. However, absolute values for barrier heights from these theoretical approaches, are systematically lower than those obtained from the fitting of cross sections by means of statistical model calculations [11][12][13][14][15][16]23,24]. (ii) In the second place, and considering that the uncertainties associated with our measurements [15] are modest, we note that small differences between the selected barrier heights entering our model calculations could eventually destroy the agreement between level groups (and level voids) and the corresponding structures in the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(i) In the first place, there are several works presenting calculations of fission barrier heights, using semimicroscopic models based on the Strutinsky [26][27][28] and Hartree-Fock [29,30] methods. However, absolute values for barrier heights from these theoretical approaches, are systematically lower than those obtained from the fitting of cross sections by means of statistical model calculations [11][12][13][14][15][16]23,24]. (ii) In the second place, and considering that the uncertainties associated with our measurements [15] are modest, we note that small differences between the selected barrier heights entering our model calculations could eventually destroy the agreement between level groups (and level voids) and the corresponding structures in the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, absolute values for barrier heights from these theoretical approaches, are systematically lower than those obtained from the fitting of cross sections by means of statistical model calculations [11][12][13][14][15][16]23,24]. (ii) In the second place, and considering that the uncertainties associated with our measurements [15] are modest, we note that small differences between the selected barrier heights entering our model calculations could eventually destroy the agreement between level groups (and level voids) and the corresponding structures in the measured cross sections. In fact, this drawback explains why theoretically obtained fission barriers are not generally used in statistical calculations of cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations