1989
DOI: 10.1119/1.15906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photogates: An instrument evaluation

Abstract: The effective length of a flag executing photogate transit varies from photogate to photogate. It also varies with the position in the gap where it crosses the beam, and with the speed of the flag. Measurements were made using 23 photogates (the PASCO model 9204 and its newly updated version, the model 9204A). The flags were 11.66-mm-diam cylinders. The effective length of these flags was found to vary from photogate to photogate by up to 20%; vary with gap position by up to 8%; decrease by about 0.2% per mete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows each student to make his own video during the same experiment and analyse it by himself on the spot. Second, the direct reading of time and position means that no calibration is needed (including for the quoted program) to avoid errors, as in the experiments with photogates, for example [10,14]. Third, although the results obtained by the method we proposed were better when using an air track, we showed in separate experiments that Newton's second law can be verified using also a sufficiently smooth surface, so these experiments are within the budget of any school.…”
Section: Summary and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 81%
“…This allows each student to make his own video during the same experiment and analyse it by himself on the spot. Second, the direct reading of time and position means that no calibration is needed (including for the quoted program) to avoid errors, as in the experiments with photogates, for example [10,14]. Third, although the results obtained by the method we proposed were better when using an air track, we showed in separate experiments that Newton's second law can be verified using also a sufficiently smooth surface, so these experiments are within the budget of any school.…”
Section: Summary and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 81%
“…The intervals measured by the time sensors are subject to unwanted or unexpected effects that can cause one sensor to systematically record slightly different time intervals from another. The origin of these variations may be associated with the numerical accuracy of the time recorded by the sensors; positioning of the light barrier that may not be properly perpendicular to the sensors; sensitivity of the sensors to the speed of the cart; peculiarities of the response curve of the sensors (different thresholds and asymmetries), etc [12][13][14]. Here, we will not enter into detail in discussing the origin of these effects, but we will analyze their impact on the kinematic quantities analyzed in sections 2 and 3.…”
Section: Analysis Of Systematic Effects On the Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%