2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-235-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photogrammetry for Archaeology: Collecting Pieces Together

Abstract: The complexity of retrieving and understanding the archaeological data requires to apply different techniques, tools and sensors for information gathering, processing and documenting. Archaeological research now has the interdisciplinary nature involving technologies based on different physical principles for retrieving information about archaeological findings. The important part of archaeological data is visual and spatial information which allows reconstructing the appearance of the findings and relation be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a digital approach allows to easy collecting new type of archaeological document, it is not still widely used in the current practice of archaeology (Knyaz et al, 2017). The reasons could be: "historical traditions" of archaeological documenting, initial costs of producing 3D data (Chibunichev et al, 2018) and the "difficulty to integrate 3D world with other more standard 2D material" (Remondino et al 2010). Furthermore, the big amount of data collected by digital instruments forces the researches to change their approaches and their methods for new kind of data processing (Wagtendonk et al, 2009), (Eppich et al, 2013), (Pollefeys et al, 2001), (Berndt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Archaeology and Digital Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a digital approach allows to easy collecting new type of archaeological document, it is not still widely used in the current practice of archaeology (Knyaz et al, 2017). The reasons could be: "historical traditions" of archaeological documenting, initial costs of producing 3D data (Chibunichev et al, 2018) and the "difficulty to integrate 3D world with other more standard 2D material" (Remondino et al 2010). Furthermore, the big amount of data collected by digital instruments forces the researches to change their approaches and their methods for new kind of data processing (Wagtendonk et al, 2009), (Eppich et al, 2013), (Pollefeys et al, 2001), (Berndt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Archaeology and Digital Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of suitable anthropological documentation, aimed at the morphological, morphometric, palaeopathological and biomechanical study of individual bone remains, there was a need for the calibration of the photographic instrumentation with high resolution, that is, able to guarantee a high accuracy of the anatomical details. At the same time, in the phase of elaboration of the polygonal/three-dimensional model (Reverse Modeling) particular attention was paid to the editing phase (Chibunichev, Knyaz, Zhuravlev & Kurkov, 2018;Seguchi & Dudzik 2019). This is because software or non-specialized operators in the anthropological field could correct the various geometries by adopting parameters connected with the aesthetic rendering of the 3D product, effectively homogenizing the surfaces, decimating the meshes and closing the gaps.…”
Section: D Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-contact measurement techniques are widely implemented today on various stages of archaeological research (starting from the initial phases of excavations to documenting, analysing and restoration of findings) and preserving cultural heritage (Badiu et al, 2015;Chibunichev et al, 2018;Scianna and La Guardia, 2018;Vasilyev et al, 2019). Usually, the material used for studies in archaeology, anthropology or palaeoanthropology is unique and requires significant effort to obtain, preserve as well as to study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%