Photogrammetry vs CT Scan: Evaluation of Accuracy of a Low‐Cost Three‐Dimensional Acquisition Method for Forensic Facial Approximation

Abstract

Photogrammetry is a three‐dimensional acquisition method potentially applicable to the forensic field. This possibility requires the verification of its accuracy. In this study, 3D volumes of skulls are generated to compare the photogrammetry versus the CT scan. In order to provide eligible material to the photogrammetric software, photographs were captured at a distance of 30 cm from the skull placed on a support 1 m in height and illuminated with diffused laboratory ceiling artificial light. A Nikon Coolpix P7100 camera was used. Photographs capture common elements with the previous and the next photograph so as to allow the photogrammetric software to recognize these common points between photographs and create a 3D puzzle. The Zephyr Lite (3DFlow©) software was employed to register the 3D volume. CT‐based skulls are taken as a metric reference. The photogrammetry‐based skulls are then enlarged according to the measurements of some landmarks or Zygion and Zygion, the distance between end of nasal and base of nasal pyramid for frontal projection, and minimum breadth of the mandibular ramus for the right lateral projection. The accuracy of the photogrammetry is compared to that of the CT scan by measuring the 3D volumes of the skulls studied. Specific landmarks are used as reference points for the measures in both frontal and lateral views. Bland–Altman graph shows homogeneity. The mean difference (1.28 mm) indicates that the measurements taken on the photogrammetry‐based skull tend to slightly overestimate compared with the measurements taken on the CT‐based skull.

The topography of diet: Orientation patch count predicts diet in turtles

“…Only at minimum area = 0.01 was there no significant difference between bone and keratin OPCr as well as significant differences between dietary categories. Though there does not appear to be a study specifically comparing the OPCr results of different 3D modeling methods, there is some evidence that photogrammetry results in overestimation of model features in forensic applications (Donato et al, 2020). Comparing the meshes used in this study with meshes produced by CT scan or other methods will be important to determine which scanning technique or techniques give the most accurate and biologically meaningful results.…”

Evaluation of photogrammetry for medical application in cardiology

“…In this paper CT scan was used as gold standard. Comparing CT with photogrammetry is important considering the limitations and advantages of both techniques (Markose et al, 2009;Donato et al, 2020). The accuracy of the photogrammetric technique was evaluated and the results obtained are very encouraging.…”

“…By doing so, a more precise edge to the removed area can be defined. If the number of polygons is too low, the accuracy of the line will be reduced (Donato et al, 2020), thus causing possible errors. It is essential to control the number of polygons that make up the mesh also in order to obtain a more accurate result during the measurements.…”

A deep learning-based automatic tool for measuring the lengths of linear scars: forensic applications

“…They concluded that the differences between the manual point and automatic point measurements were very small. Donato et al [ 14 ] generated 3D volumes of skulls to compare the photogrammetry versus the CT scan. Their experiment results indicated that the measurements taken on the photogrammetry-based skull tend to slightly overestimate compared with those taken on the CT-based skull.…”