2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00018-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in mature and young leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2A), which was probably due to inhibition of the acceptor side of PS2 (Bertamini and Nedunchezhian 2003). The highest F 0 recorded early in the morning in D-vines (about 20 % higher than that in I-plants), may well be the response to prolonged and gradual soil water shortage due to the progressively depression of transcription of several genes associated with the structure and function of photosynthesis (Flexas et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2A), which was probably due to inhibition of the acceptor side of PS2 (Bertamini and Nedunchezhian 2003). The highest F 0 recorded early in the morning in D-vines (about 20 % higher than that in I-plants), may well be the response to prolonged and gradual soil water shortage due to the progressively depression of transcription of several genes associated with the structure and function of photosynthesis (Flexas et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An increase in F 0 may be induced by the inactivation of part of PS2 RCs (Hong and Xu 1999). In mature grape leaves, when F 0 increased under HI, some PS2 RCs lost their photochemical activity, as indicated by a marked decline in the photochemical efficiency of PS2 (F v /F m ) (Bertamini and Nedunchezhian 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also noteworthy that at the drought stage, F 0 of C11/2 leaves increases, whereas other modern genotypes reveal a decrease and WT no response. Elevation in F 0 may result from inhibition of the acceptor side of PSII (Bertamini and Nedunchezhian 2003), Q A reduction, and dissociation of LHCII from PSII (Yamane et al 2000 and references therein). Consequently, F 0 ' of drought-treated C11/2 plants strongly increases.…”
Section: Cf Parameters Responsementioning
confidence: 99%