2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoionization and photodissociation rates in solar and blackbody radiation fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
182
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
182
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of sources and losses, the F, Cl, and O element abundances must vary inversely with the square of the distance (except close to the nucleus) so that their ratios are constant. It is known that there is no significant loss of the hydrogen halides through photo-dissociation as the HF and HCl photo-dissociation length scales far exceed the cometocentric distances considered here; photo-destruction of the main oxygen-bearing species is a similarly slow process so that relatively little oxygen is lost (Huebner & Mukherjee 2015). Being close to the nucleus, losses through charge exchange, electron impact ionization, and ion-neutral reactions are thought to be of limited importance (Vinodkumar et al 2010;Nilsson et al 2015;Fuselier et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the absence of sources and losses, the F, Cl, and O element abundances must vary inversely with the square of the distance (except close to the nucleus) so that their ratios are constant. It is known that there is no significant loss of the hydrogen halides through photo-dissociation as the HF and HCl photo-dissociation length scales far exceed the cometocentric distances considered here; photo-destruction of the main oxygen-bearing species is a similarly slow process so that relatively little oxygen is lost (Huebner & Mukherjee 2015). Being close to the nucleus, losses through charge exchange, electron impact ionization, and ion-neutral reactions are thought to be of limited importance (Vinodkumar et al 2010;Nilsson et al 2015;Fuselier et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But according to NIST, its fragmentation does not produce SO ions. According to Huebner & Mukherjee (2015), the photodissociation rate for SO 2 to SO is at 1 au 1.59 × 10 −4 s −1 . As a consequence, the contribution to SO is negligible as the gas propagation time is merely seconds from the surface of the comet to Rosetta (see Table A1).…”
Section: Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closer to the Sun, photodissociation and ionization potentially become more important for the coma composition since the rates increase. Photodissociation and ionization rates for most sulphur-bearing species in this study have been computed from the values by Huebner & Mukherjee (2015) at 1 au for active and quiet Sun. Here we used the values for quiet Sun.…”
Section: Impact Of Photodissociation and Ionization On Abundance Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…depending on solar conditions and should fall off as the square of the heliocentric distance [Huebner and Mukherjee, 2015]. Therefore, only a small fraction of the cometary molecules gets ionized in the vicinity of the comet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%