2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoluminescent and Slow Magnetic Relaxation Studies on Lanthanide(III)-2,5-pyrazinedicarboxylate Frameworks

Abstract: In the series described in this work, the hydrothermal synthesis led to oxidation of the 5-methyl-pyrazinecarboxylate anion to the 2,5-pyrazinedicarboxylate dianion (2,5-pzdc) allowing the preparation of three-dimensional (3D) lanthanide(III) organic frameworks of formula {[Ln(2,5-pzdc)(HO)]·6HO} [Ln = Ce (1), Pr (2), Nd (3), and Eu (4)] and {[Er(2,5-pzdc)(HO)]·5HO} (5). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction on 1-5 reveals that they crystallize in the triclinic system, P1̅ space group with the series 1-4 being isos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
12
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the fitting procedure for complexes 1 – 3 some of the parameter values were fixed using typical values previously reported in the literature [for 1 : g Pr = 0.89 (theoretical g J for Pr III is 0.80); for 2 : g Cu = 2.0; for 3 : g Sm = 0.29 (theoretical g J for Sm III is 0.29), λ Sm = 220 cm –1 ; Table ] , , , . The values obtained for Δ and g Nd for 1 and 2 (Table ) are in good correspondence with those reported previously using the same interpretative approach , , , , , . However, in many prior cases, the fitting procedures were simplified for Pr III ‐containing complexes by using only equation (5) (the χ ⊥ term was neglected) , .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…During the fitting procedure for complexes 1 – 3 some of the parameter values were fixed using typical values previously reported in the literature [for 1 : g Pr = 0.89 (theoretical g J for Pr III is 0.80); for 2 : g Cu = 2.0; for 3 : g Sm = 0.29 (theoretical g J for Sm III is 0.29), λ Sm = 220 cm –1 ; Table ] , , , . The values obtained for Δ and g Nd for 1 and 2 (Table ) are in good correspondence with those reported previously using the same interpretative approach , , , , , . However, in many prior cases, the fitting procedures were simplified for Pr III ‐containing complexes by using only equation (5) (the χ ⊥ term was neglected) , .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The fitting afforded values of C = 1.03 s –1 K – n , n ≈ 6, and A = 823.60 s –1 K –1 . These values are comparable to those found for other Nd III compounds . Although usually n = 9 for Kramers ions, n values between 1 and 6 can be considered acceptable, as a result of the structure of the levels …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The best‐fit parameters obtained by using Equation (2) are listed in Table . This mechanism has been recently proposed for an octahedral cobalt(II) complex as well for some compounds with lanthanide(III) ions…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%