“…Generally speaking, the Cu(I) ion is able to adopt myriad coordination geometries including linear CuX 2 , CuX 3 triangle, and CuX 4 tetrahedron (X = Br, I). More interestingly, the tetrahedral CuX 4 unit features high self-assembly characterization and diversiform condensation modes including corner- and edge-sharing as well as short Cu···Cu interactions. , To date, numerous [Cu x X y ] (y–x)– anionic clusters or secondary building units (SBUs) have been characterized including binuclear [Cu 2 X 3 ] − , [Cu 2 X 4 ] 2– , and [Cu 2 X 6 ] 4– ; trinuclear [Cu 3 X 7 ] 4– and [Cu 3 X 8 ] 5– ; tetranuclear [Cu 4 X 6 ] 2– , [Cu 4 I 8 ] 4– , [Cu 4 X 9 ] 5– , and [Cu 4 X 11 ] 7– ; pentanuclear [Cu 5 X 7 ] 2– ; hexanuclear [Cu 6 I 10 ] 4– and [Cu 6 I 11 ] 5– , and even larger [Cu 8 I 13 ] 5– and [Cu 36 I 56 ] 20‑ units, etc. − Using these clusters or SBUs as building blocks, a large amount of 1D chains including [Cu 2 X 3 ] − , [Cu 2 X 4 ] 2– , [Cu 3 X 4 ] − , [Cu 3 X 6 ] 3– , [Cu 4 X 6 ] 2– , [Cu 5 X 7 ] 2– , and [Cu 6 X 7 ] − , etc., and 2D layers of [Cu 3 I 4 ] − , [Cu 4 I 5 ] − , and [Cu 11 I 17 ] 6– , etc., have also been reported and characterized. − Relatively, three-dimensional (3D) frameworks are rarely documented with limited topological networks.…”