2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10511-012-9255-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photometry of the dwarf nova V503 Cyg in 2010. Orbital and other periods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orbital period determined from the 2012 quiescent data was 0.077755(1) d. Similarly, the 2011 quiescent data (Kato et al 2013a) yielded 0.077766(5) d. A combined analysis of the 2011 and 2012 data yielded 0.0777591(2) d, which we adopted as the refined orbital period. This period is in good agreement with 0.077760(3) d reported in Pavlenko et al (2012).…”
Section: Kato Et Al 2012asupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The orbital period determined from the 2012 quiescent data was 0.077755(1) d. Similarly, the 2011 quiescent data (Kato et al 2013a) yielded 0.077766(5) d. A combined analysis of the 2011 and 2012 data yielded 0.0777591(2) d, which we adopted as the refined orbital period. This period is in good agreement with 0.077760(3) d reported in Pavlenko et al (2012).…”
Section: Kato Et Al 2012asupporting
confidence: 92%
“…proposed that the disk tilt, which is supposed to cause negative superhumps, is responsible for the suppression of normal outbursts. In recent years, V503 Cyg did not show distinct negative superhumps (Kato et al 2013a;Pavlenko et al 2012).…”
Section: V503 Cygnimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The orbital period derived from the 2012 quiescent data was 0.077755(1) d. Similarly, the 2011 quiescent data ) yielded 0.077766(5) d. A combined analysis of the 2011 and 2012 data yielded 0.0777591(2) d, which we adopted as a refined orbital period. This period is in agreement with 0.077760(3) d reported in Pavlenko et al (2012). Approximate cycle counts (E) after the start of the superoutburst were used.…”
Section: V503 Cygnisupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Osaki and Kato (2013a) proposed that the disk tilt, which is supposed to cause negative superhumps, is responsible for the suppression of normal outbursts. In recent years, V503 Cyg has not shown distinct negative superhumps Pavlenko et al 2012). We observed the 2012 June superoutburst, including the quiescent segments before and after this superoutburst.…”
Section: V503 Cygnimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For V1504 Cyg (Osaki, Kato 2013a) and V344 Lyr (Osaki, Kato 2013b) it is established that the decrease of the frequency of normal outbursts is accompanied by the negative superhumps appearance. Vice versa, the disappearing of the negative superhumps was found for V503 Cyg [Kato et al (2013), Pavlenko et al (2012)] during the stage of a frequent normal outbursts. Since NY Ser entered the stage of frequent normal outbursts after the 2013 superoutburst, we checked whether there were negative superhumps or "impulsive" negative superhumps [Osaki, Kato (2013b)] in the data in the state of relatively infrequent normal outbursts including the wide outburst.…”
Section: Periodicity Outside Superoutburstmentioning
confidence: 95%