1972
DOI: 10.1364/josa.62.001309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon-Count Distributions and Irradiance Fluctuations of a Log-Normally Distributed Light Field*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering of laser light through an RGG has drawn a great interest for producing a pseudo thermal light or light with partial coherence and found variety of applications [25][26][27][28][29][30]. This method for producing partially coherent light is very convenient because here the coherence could be controlled easily just by changing the rotation speed of the RGG.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattering of laser light through an RGG has drawn a great interest for producing a pseudo thermal light or light with partial coherence and found variety of applications [25][26][27][28][29][30]. This method for producing partially coherent light is very convenient because here the coherence could be controlled easily just by changing the rotation speed of the RGG.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Many techniques were developed, including counting statistics with fixed time interval, [2−4] coincidence-counting experiments, [2] arrival-time-interval analysing, [5] twotime correlations, [1,6,7] and so on. They were intensively used to reveal intensity fluctuations of classical photon emissions (lasers, [3] thermal light, [1,5] pseudo-thermal light, [4,6] etc. ), nonclassical photon emissions (resonant fluorescence, [8−11] single photon sources, [12−14] etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A He-Ne laser (633 nm) beam was focused on a rotating ground glass (RGG) by a lens (f = 75 mm) to produce PTL, as described in Refs. [4,6]. Then the centre of the fanningout beam passed through two apertures (A1 and A2, in diameter of about 0.2 mm) at about 0.1 m and 2.0 m away from the RGG, which ensures the transmitted PTL beam was in one coherent area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%