“…The high-resolution XPS spectra of W, O, Yb, Tm, Mn, In, and S elements are shown in Figure b–h. In the W 4f XPS spectrum, the characteristic peaks at 35.2 and 37.3 eV are attributed to W 6+ , and the characteristic peaks at 34.8 and 37 eV are assigned to W 5+ . − In Figure c, the O 1s spectrum is deconvoluted into two characteristic peaks at 530 and 531.5 eV, which are attributed to the W–O bond and surface hydroxyl groups, respectively. , As shown in Figure d, the characteristic peaks at 188.7 and 189.2 eV correspond to Yb 4d 3/2 and Yb 4d 5/2 , respectively, , , and the characteristic peak at 178.9 eV of Tm 4d is observed in Figure e, , indicating the doping of Yb and Tm elements in the photocatalyst system. The Mn 2p spectrum is displayed in Figure f and presents the characteristic peaks attributed to Mn 2+ (640.9 and 652.5 eV) and Mn 4+ (644.3 and 653.7 eV). , The In 3d characteristic peaks (Figure g) at 444.4 (In 3d 5/2 ) and 452 eV (In 3d 3/2 ) demonstrate the chemical state of In 3+ . , The energy difference between S 2p 1/2 (162.2 eV) and S 2p 3/2 (161 eV) in Figure h is calculated as 1.2 eV, revealing S 2– in the hybrid photocatalyst. , As shown in Figures S3 and S4, in comparison with those of WO 3 , the XPS spectra of W and O elements of MnIn 2 S 4 /WO 3 and MnIn 2 S 4 /WO 3 (10Yb, 5Tm) – 1 have no obvious change, indicating the great stability of WO 3 without etching/defect formation during the hydrothermal synthesis of the composite photocatalytic system.…”