2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoperiodic and temperature control of reproductive diapause induction in the predatory bug Orius strigicollis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) and its implications for biological control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a recent detailed study of the influence of photoperiod on the pre-imaginal development of different populations of the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae), the differences between the results obtained at short and long days varied, depending on temperature, from practically zero to more than 20% (Lopatina et al, 2007), while in similar experiments conducted with other representative of the same order, Orius strigicollis (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), the maximum difference between the duration of pre-imaginal development under short and long days did not exceed 10% of the total (Musolin et al, 2004). Generally, the effect of photoperiod on the duration of insect development can vary from slight changes to a sharp increase, although in the last case not protracted development but diapause induction can occur (Tauber et al, 1986;Zaslavski, 1988;Saunders, 2002).…”
Section: Pre-imaginal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in a recent detailed study of the influence of photoperiod on the pre-imaginal development of different populations of the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae), the differences between the results obtained at short and long days varied, depending on temperature, from practically zero to more than 20% (Lopatina et al, 2007), while in similar experiments conducted with other representative of the same order, Orius strigicollis (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), the maximum difference between the duration of pre-imaginal development under short and long days did not exceed 10% of the total (Musolin et al, 2004). Generally, the effect of photoperiod on the duration of insect development can vary from slight changes to a sharp increase, although in the last case not protracted development but diapause induction can occur (Tauber et al, 1986;Zaslavski, 1988;Saunders, 2002).…”
Section: Pre-imaginal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Significant differences between patterns and thresholds of two reactions would indicate their relative independence. However, such studies are rarely conducted (Zaslavski, 1988;Denlinger, 2002;Saunders, 2002;Musolin et al, 2004;Lopatina et al, 2007;Saunders, 2010). In particular, although photoperiodic responses are reported for many species of Coccinellidae (Hodek & Hon k, 1996, see Discussion for more references) in only a few are the influences of day length on the rate of the pre-imaginal development and the rate of reproductive maturation of adult females (or diapause induction) investigated over a range of photoperiods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…biology and behavior, including development, reproduction and orientation (Askari and Stern 1972;Smith and Stadelbacher 1978;Abenes and Khan 1990). For example, short daylength induces reproductive diapause in Orius strigicollis (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), whereas long daylength tends to increase developmental duration, albeit with an interaction with temperature (Musolin et al 2004). Similar results have been reported for O. insidiosus (Say) (Ruberson et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available data on the photoperiodic sensitivity of different life stages in Orius were obtained using single temperature regimes only (van den Meiracker, 1994;Ruberson et al, 2000;Cho et al, 2005). Since temperature was demonstrated to have an impact on the photoperiodic response of Orius species (Musolin et al, 2004;Musolin and Ito, 2008), photoperiodic sensitivity of different life stages was detected using both constant and fluctuating temperature regimes in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%