1981
DOI: 10.1159/000123171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoperiodic Control of Reproduction in Olfactory-Bulbectomized Rats

Abstract: 30-day-old male rats were (1) sham-operated or subjected to (2) removal of the olfactory bulbs, (3) olfactory bulbectomy and blinding, (4) olfactory bulbectomy and pinealectomy or (5) olfactory bulbectomy, blinding and pinealectomy. Animals were exposed from 30 to 110 days of age to long-day (14 h of light per day) or short-day (8 h of light per day) photoperiods. The reproductive system of neurologically-intact rats was not affected by exposure to short days. Nor did bulbectomy affect the reproductive system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Sprague Dawley rats are not known to respond to photoperiods with altered physiology or behaviour, the potential for signalling of TSH secreted from the pars tuberalis is present in this rat strain with the presence of a functional TSH receptor located in the ventricular ependymal layer. However, the applicability of the present findings may be more generic rather than merely applicable to mammals that are normally associated with seasons, as most laboratory strains of rats have the potential to respond to photoperiods with physiological changes following olfactory bulbectomy (Nelson & Zucker 1981) or after manipulation of testosteronenegative feedback (Wallen et al 1987). Moreover, the F344 rat strain does show physiological responses to photoperiods in terms of food intake and body weight (Ross et al 2011) and increases in Dio2 expression in the ependymal layer following i.c.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although Sprague Dawley rats are not known to respond to photoperiods with altered physiology or behaviour, the potential for signalling of TSH secreted from the pars tuberalis is present in this rat strain with the presence of a functional TSH receptor located in the ventricular ependymal layer. However, the applicability of the present findings may be more generic rather than merely applicable to mammals that are normally associated with seasons, as most laboratory strains of rats have the potential to respond to photoperiods with physiological changes following olfactory bulbectomy (Nelson & Zucker 1981) or after manipulation of testosteronenegative feedback (Wallen et al 1987). Moreover, the F344 rat strain does show physiological responses to photoperiods in terms of food intake and body weight (Ross et al 2011) and increases in Dio2 expression in the ependymal layer following i.c.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, photoperiodic changes in the nocturnal duration of melatonin production and locomotor activity-compressed during long days and decompressed during short days-are likely to reflect changes in the SCN itself, suggesting that the nucleus is involved in processing photoperiodic information from the environment. Although the rat is only marginally photoperiodic (22,23), it may be sensitized to the effects of photoperiod by neonatal treatment with testosterone propionate (24), olfactory bulbectomy (25), or undernutrition (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the outbred non-tropical rodents described above, many laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) strains are reproductively non-photoperiodic, although they possess the neuroendocrine mechanisms sufficient for perceiving changes in day length and for transducing ambient photoperiod into a neuroendocrine melatonin signal (Illnerova and Vanecek, 1980;Nelson et al, 1994;Nelson and Zucker, 1981;Wallen and Turek, 1981). Reproductively non-photoperiodic rats and mice thus may provide useful models to investigate mechanisms by which day length influences the immune system in a manner uncomplicated by photoperiodic influences on the reproductive system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%