2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photophysical investigation of the formation of defect levels in P doped ZnO thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak at 3.14 eV in both the samples corresponds to transition from CBM to shallow acceptor level P Zn -2V Zn . As it is reported that this level lie between 0.20 and 0.18 eV above VBM [44]. The peak appeared at 3.14 eV is logically at 0.19 and 0.18 eV above VBM for sample PZ74 and PZ84 simultaneously.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The peak at 3.14 eV in both the samples corresponds to transition from CBM to shallow acceptor level P Zn -2V Zn . As it is reported that this level lie between 0.20 and 0.18 eV above VBM [44]. The peak appeared at 3.14 eV is logically at 0.19 and 0.18 eV above VBM for sample PZ74 and PZ84 simultaneously.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…ZnO NRs/ZnO film shows photoresponse with a photosensitivity value of 1.12 under 350 nm UV illumination due to band edge absorption and photocarrier generation. A small response with a photosensitivity of 1.04 is also observed under 500 nm illumination, which is associated with the in-gap defect levels in ZnO . Also, the photoresponse is very slow for the ZnO NRs/ZnO film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A small response with a photosensitivity of 1.04 is also observed under 500 nm illumination, which is associated with the in-gap defect levels in ZnO. 48 Also, the photoresponse is very slow for the ZnO NRs/ZnO film. Under NIR illumination, no photoresponse has been observed.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deconvoluted peak values are given in table 5 for all samples. For sample 3 the band edge (BE) peak is observed at 3.24 eV which corresponds to UVPL transition in the bandgap [12]. For samples 1 and 2 the donor-like defect-related transitions are more as compared to sample 3.…”
Section: Optical Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%