2018
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201800501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoredox Catalytic Activation of Sulfur Hexafluoride for Pentafluorosulfanylation of α‐Methyl‐ and α‐Phenyl Styrene

Abstract: Sulfur hexafluoridei si nert, non-toxic, and cannot simplyb e applieda sp entafluorosulfanylation reagent. We present the first photoredoxc atalytic way to convert it into pentafluorosulfanylated a-methyl and a-phenyl styrenes simply by using light. Thew ork tacklest he challenges of precise activation of sulfur hexafluorideb yaphotoredox catalystw ith designed consecutive electron transfer cycles in af ashiont hat styrenes trap the generated pentafluorosulfanyl radical. The method overcomes the highly problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
58
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we report an advanced photoredox catalytic method for the activation of SF 6 , which not only pentafluorosulfanylates α‐methyl‐ ( 1 ) and α‐phenyl‐ ( 2 ) styrenes but additionally forms a C−O bond, which significantly broadens the synthetic scope and opens the way for the functionalization of SF 5 building blocks. In contrast to fluorination, our approach precisely controls the local reductivity by N‐phenylphenothiazine ( 3 ) as a strong photoredox catalyst in order to transfer the SF 5 group to α‐methyl‐ ( 1 ) and α‐phenyl‐ ( 2 ) styrenes to yield products 4 and 5 . Mechanistic investigations revealed a two‐fold excitation process (Figure ), similar to the conPET process reported by the König group .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Herein, we report an advanced photoredox catalytic method for the activation of SF 6 , which not only pentafluorosulfanylates α‐methyl‐ ( 1 ) and α‐phenyl‐ ( 2 ) styrenes but additionally forms a C−O bond, which significantly broadens the synthetic scope and opens the way for the functionalization of SF 5 building blocks. In contrast to fluorination, our approach precisely controls the local reductivity by N‐phenylphenothiazine ( 3 ) as a strong photoredox catalyst in order to transfer the SF 5 group to α‐methyl‐ ( 1 ) and α‐phenyl‐ ( 2 ) styrenes to yield products 4 and 5 . Mechanistic investigations revealed a two‐fold excitation process (Figure ), similar to the conPET process reported by the König group .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…This mode of reactivity was explored recently by Jamison and McTeague, as well as by Rueping and co‐workers, who reported deoxyfluorination‐type chemistry under photoredox conditions (Figure ) . We unlocked the complementary mode of activation of SF 6 for pentafluorosulfanylation of α‐substituted styrenes …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Im Gegensatz zu den Desoxyfluorierungen kontrolliert unser Ansatz die lokalen Reduktionseigenschaften durch den starken Photoredoxkatalysator N‐Phenylphenothiazin ( 3 ), um die SF 5 ‐Gruppe auf α‐Methyl‐ ( 1 ) und α‐Phenylstyrol ( 2 ) zu übertragen und 4 bzw. 5 zu erhalten . Die mechanistischen Untersuchungen ergaben einen zweifachen Anregungsprozess (Abbildung ), ähnlich dem conPET‐Prozess, der von König berichtet wurde .…”
Section: Figureunclassified
“…Die einfache Zugabe von MeOH zur Reaktionsmischung bestehend aus 1 oder 2 , Katalysator 3 und SF 6 in MeCN ergab die Methylether 8 oder 9 . Die zuvor beobachtete Dimerisierung von 2 wurde vollständig unterdrückt, was wahrscheinlich am schnellen Abfangen von 2 .+ durch MeOH liegt. Der letzte Schritt zur Pentafluorosulfanylierung ist das einfache Abfangen der entstandenen Radikale 6 .…”
Section: Figureunclassified